These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Judgment of numerosity: effects of symmetry and goodness in dot pattern arrays. Howe E; Jung K Acta Psychol (Amst); 1987 Jan; 64(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 3577847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateral organization and the perception of orientation in pictures: a comment on Freimuth & Wapner's experiment. Gordon IE Br J Psychol; 1981 Aug; 72(Pt 3):317-9. PubMed ID: 7317715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preference for lateral directional properties: a reply to Gordon. Freimuth M; Wapner S Br J Psychol; 1981 Aug; 72(Pt 3):321-2. PubMed ID: 7317716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of visual aftereffects and inferences about binocular mechanisms in human vision. Wilcox LM; Timney B; St John R Perception; 1990; 19(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 2336334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are monocular arrays discriminable from binocular arrays? Kunzendorf RG; Butler W; Pearson B Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):531-4. PubMed ID: 3399330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of set size on hemifield asymmetries in letter recognition. Miller LK; Butler D Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 7363074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Monocular asymmetries in recognition after an eye movement: sighting dominance and dextrality. Porac C; Coren S Percept Psychophys; 1979 Jan; 25(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 432091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral memory after binocular discrimination training: left hemisphere dominance in the chick? Gaston KE; Gaston MG Brain Res; 1984 Jun; 303(1):190-3. PubMed ID: 6733524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of evoked potentials in man during discrimination of complex patterns. Zelenkova TP; Ivanitskii AM Hum Physiol; 1979; 5(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 548440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A simple demonstration of border dominance in binocular rivalry. Remole A Percept Psychophys; 1980 Jul; 28(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 7413413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatio-temporal discrimination of frequency in the right and left visual fields: a preliminary report. Rao SM; Rourke D; Whitman RD Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):311-6. PubMed ID: 7290879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification. Peterzell DH; Harvey LO; Hardyck CD Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 2813029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings. Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition of designs after a unilateral stroke. Riege WH; Harker JO; Metter EJ; Hanson WR Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Apr; 54(2):538. PubMed ID: 7079081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of luminance on perceptual alternation of ambiguous patterns. Riani M; Oliva GA; Selis G; Ciurlo G; Rossi P Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Feb; 58(1):267-74. PubMed ID: 6718192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]