These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6524616)

  • 1. Allometry between length and cross-sectional dimensions of the femur and tibia in Homo sapiens sapiens.
    Ruff CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1984 Dec; 65(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 6524616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae--a biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general patterns of variation.
    Ruff CB; Hayes WC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1983 Mar; 60(3):359-81. PubMed ID: 6846510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae--a biomechanical investigation: II. Sex, age, side differences.
    Ruff CB; Hayes WC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1983 Mar; 60(3):383-400. PubMed ID: 6846511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural changes in the femur with the transition to agriculture on the Georgia coast.
    Ruff CB; Larsen CS; Hayes WC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1984 Jun; 64(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 6465303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating human long bone cross-sectional geometric properties: a comparison of noninvasive methods.
    O'Neill MC; Ruff CB
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Oct; 47(4):221-35. PubMed ID: 15454334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Body size, locomotion, and long bone cross-sectional geometry in indriid primates.
    Demes B; Jungers WL; Selpien K
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Dec; 86(4):537-47. PubMed ID: 1776660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal allometry and interlimb scaling patterns in mustelid carnivorans.
    Heinrich RE; Biknevicius AR
    J Morphol; 1998 Feb; 235(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 9438972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for assessment of maximum long bone length and living stature from fragmentary long bones.
    Steele DG; McKern TW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1969 Sep; 31(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 5348797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed tomography and biomechanical analysis of fossil long bones.
    Jungers WL; Minns RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1979 Feb; 50(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 109011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of primate, carnivoran and rodent limb bone cross-sectional properties: are primates really unique?
    Polk JD; Demes B; Jungers WL; Biknevicius AR; Heinrich RE; Runestad JA
    J Hum Evol; 2000 Sep; 39(3):297-325. PubMed ID: 10964531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia.
    Ruff CB; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(6):886-96. PubMed ID: 3171769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of body proportions on femoral and tibial midshaft shape in hunter-gatherers.
    Shaw CN; Stock JT
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Jan; 144(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 20623683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural allometry of the femur and tibia in Hominoidea and Macaca.
    Ruff C
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 1987; 48(1-2):9-49. PubMed ID: 3115877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry.
    Lieberman DE; Polk JD; Demes B
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Feb; 123(2):156-71. PubMed ID: 14730649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. I: Temporal trends and mechanical interpretation.
    Ruff CB; Trinkaus E; Walker A; Larsen CS
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 May; 91(1):21-53. PubMed ID: 8512053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear and geometric morphometric analysis of long bone scaling patterns in Jurassic neosauropod dinosaurs: their functional and paleobiological implications.
    Bonnan MF
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Sep; 290(9):1089-111. PubMed ID: 17721981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: variability and commonality among modern humans.
    Auerbach BM; Ruff CB
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Feb; 50(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 16310833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical note: The effect of midshaft location on the error ranges of femoral and tibial cross-sectional parameters.
    Sládek V; Berner M; Galeta P; Friedl L; Kudrnová S
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Feb; 141(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 19919000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex-specific developmental changes in muscle size and bone geometry at the femoral shaft.
    Högler W; Blimkie CJ; Cowell CT; Inglis D; Rauch F; Kemp AF; Wiebe P; Duncan CS; Farpour-Lambert N; Woodhead HJ
    Bone; 2008 May; 42(5):982-9. PubMed ID: 18337201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.