These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment. Aviram U Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 8364237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of mental health system changes on civil commitment. Faulkner LR; Bloom JD; McFarland BH; Stern TO Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 4074899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the black letter of the law: an empirical study of an individual judge's decision process for civil commitment hearings. Bursztajn HJ; Hamm RM; Gutheil TG J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 9148885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A methodology for predicting the effects of changes in civil commitment decision making. Faulkner LR; McFarland BH; Bloom JD; Stern TO Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3697520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Civil commitment in Wisconsin: the impact of Lessard v. Schmidt. Zander TK Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(2):503-62. PubMed ID: 11664748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Substantive due process limits on the duration of civil commitment for the treatment of mental illness. Burgett DW Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):205-64. PubMed ID: 11650560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations. Hiday VA Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Minnesota Advance Psychiatric Directive. Protecting patient decision making. Dixon G Minn Med; 1992 Dec; 75(12):33-4. PubMed ID: 1361651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment. National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changing trends in mental health legislation: anatomy of reforming a civil commitment law. Aviram U; Weyer RA J Health Polit Policy Law; 1996; 21(4):771-805. PubMed ID: 8892006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment. Bailey WS; Pyfer JF Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Civil commitment decisionmaking: a report on one decisionmaker's experience. Morris GH South Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 61(2):291-351. PubMed ID: 11659028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mentally ill and dangerous: civil commitment or internment? The Belgian judicial framework]. Smets H; Verelst R; Vandenberghe J Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 19434576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oregon's civil commitment law: 140 years of change. Bloom JD; Williams MH Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 May; 45(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 8045542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusal of medical treatment in "captive" circumstances. Somerville MA Can Bar Rev; 1985; 63():59-90. PubMed ID: 11660372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]