These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6525935)

  • 1. The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: II. Statistical analysis.
    Wild JM; Flanagan JG; Barnes DA; Gilmartin BA; Good PA; Crews SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Dec; 58(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 6525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: III. Clinical analysis.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Barnes DA; Gilmartin BA; Good PA; Crews SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Dec; 58(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 6549288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: I. Scoring system.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Barnes DA; Gilmartin BA; Good PA; Crews SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Dec; 58(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 6525934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manipulation of sensitivity in visual field investigation.
    Barnes DA; Wild JM; Flanagan JG; Good PA; Crews SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1985 Jun; 59(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 4028920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry.
    Bevers C; Blanckaert G; Van Keer K; Fils JF; Vandewalle E; Stalmans I
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e499-e505. PubMed ID: 30345638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer.
    Hicks BC; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Programmed visual field testing.
    Anderson DR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1982; 80():326-48. PubMed ID: 7182966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of the Dicon Auto Perimeter 2000 compared with that of the Goldmann perimeter.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 96(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 6660263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The perimetry of the blind spot. A comparison of kinetic and static, computerized stratgies].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1979; 179(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 548856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. JO and STATJO: programs for investigating the visual field with the Octopus automatic perimeter.
    Flammer J; Drance SM; Jenni A; Bebie H
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 18(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 6688197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experiences with the use of an automated perimeter (Octopus) in the diagnosis and management of patients with glaucoma and neurologic diseases.
    Li SG; Spaeth GL; Scimeca HA; Schatz NJ; Savino PJ
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1302-16. PubMed ID: 233862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interpretation of the differential threshold in the central visual field.
    Wild JM; Wood JM; Flanagan JG; Good PA; Crews SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1986 Feb; 62(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 3956369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Peritest automatic perimeter in screening for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Douglas GR
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 18(7):318-20. PubMed ID: 6671150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
    Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A feasible development of computerized perimetry.
    Krakau CE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 7315206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk.
    Batko KA; Anctil JL; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 95(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 6837687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.
    Wilscher S; Wabbels B; Lorenz B
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 248(10):1493-500. PubMed ID: 20232076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual field (Octopus 1-2-3) in normal subjects divided into homogeneous age-groups.
    Calixto N; Santos RM; Cronemberger S
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(5):637-43. PubMed ID: 17187126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.