These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6526660)

  • 1. Computer-assisted methods for design optimization of cardiac bioprosthetic valves.
    Hamid MS; Sabbah HN; Stein PD
    Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1984; 32(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 6526660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of a trileaflet valve design.
    Thubrikar MJ; Samanta S; Nolan SP
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1991; 1(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 10149054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-destructive evaluation techniques for prosthetic heart valves based on hologram interferometry. Part II: Experimental results and clinical implications.
    Geiger AW; Zarubin AM; Fahrenkamp A; Konertz W; von Bally G; Scheld HH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jul; 2(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 8269148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fluid solid interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valve].
    Ma X; Du Y; Zhang L; Hou Z; Ye X
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 38(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 25597077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valve cusp and wall tissues is initiated during tissue preparation: an ultrastructural study.
    Simionescu DT; Lovekamp JJ; Vyavahare NR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 12701796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations.
    Kim H; Chandran KB; Sacks MS; Lu J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 17089074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-destructive evaluation techniques for prosthetic heart valves based on hologram interferometry. Part I.
    Zarubin AM; Geiger AW; von Bally G; Scheld HH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jul; 2(4):440-7. PubMed ID: 8269147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
    Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new design for polyurethane heart valves.
    Butterfield M; Wheatley DJ; Williams DF; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 11206756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement and reconstruction of the leaflet geometry for a pericardial artificial heart valve.
    Jiang H; Campbell G; Xi F
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15642513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Matsue H; Sawa Y; Matsumiya G; Matsuda H; Hamada S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An optimal mounting frame to reduce flexural stresses of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Vesely I; Krucinski S; Dokainish MA; Campbell G
    ASAIO J; 1994; 40(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 8003759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bubble formation on St. Jude Medical mechanical heart valves: an in-vitro study.
    Milo S; Gutfinger C; Chu GY; Gharib M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 May; 12(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of design on bioprosthetic valve durability.
    Vesely I
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 11921660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research on the modeling of biological valves poppet].
    Yuan Q; Zhou Y; Cong H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Dec; 22(6):1197-9. PubMed ID: 16422098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.