These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6526756)

  • 1. Genetic correlations of pig performance and sow productivity traits.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Dec; 59(6):1477-87. PubMed ID: 6526756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A genetic analysis of sow productivity traits.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1149-63. PubMed ID: 6542565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population parameter estimates for performance and reproductive traits in Polish Large White nucleus herds.
    Kaplon MJ; Rothschild MF; Berger PJ; Healey M
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jan; 69(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 2005041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
    Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of genetic associations between reproduction and production traits based on a sire and dam line with common ancestry.
    Kapell DN; Ashworth CJ; Walling GA; Lawrence AB; Edwards SA; Roehe R
    Animal; 2009 Oct; 3(10):1354-62. PubMed ID: 22444929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for sow productivity.
    Irvin KM; Swiger LA
    J Anim Sci; 1984 May; 58(5):1144-50. PubMed ID: 6539771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits.
    Ferguson PW; Harvey WR; Irvin KM
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Feb; 60(2):375-84. PubMed ID: 4039308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
    Gaugler HR; Buchanan DS; Hintz RL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of Duroc and Yorkshire boars and gilts and reciprocal breed crosses.
    Bereskin B; Steele NC
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Apr; 62(4):918-26. PubMed ID: 3710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic relationship between boar taint compounds, human nose scores, and reproduction traits in pigs.
    Mathur PK; ten Napel J; Crump RE; Mulder HA; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4080-9. PubMed ID: 23825333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.
    Putz AM; Tiezzi F; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Knauer MT
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Nov; 93(11):5153-63. PubMed ID: 26641035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic parameters and trends for production traits and their relationship with litter traits in Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
    Lopez BIM; Song C; Seo K
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Oct; 89(10):1381-1388. PubMed ID: 30073716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines.
    Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15583040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic relationships between boar feed efficiency and sow piglet production, body condition score, and stayability in Norwegian Landrace pigs.
    Martinsen KH; Ødegård J; Aasmundstad T; Olsen D; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3159-3168. PubMed ID: 27695777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: II. Reproduction of F1 ewes in fall mating seasons.
    Casas E; Freking BA; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1280-9. PubMed ID: 15144067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.