109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6527097)
21. A novel and simple method for quantification of small, dense LDL.
Hirano T; Ito Y; Saegusa H; Yoshino G
J Lipid Res; 2003 Nov; 44(11):2193-201. PubMed ID: 12897184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Five methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared.
Demacker PN; Hijmans AG; Brenninkmeijer BJ; Jansen AP; van 't Laar A
Clin Chem; 1984 Nov; 30(11):1797-800. PubMed ID: 6593139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A study of the heparin-manganese chloride method for determination of plasma alpha-lipoprotein cholesterol concentration.
Ishikawa TT; Brazier JB; Steiner PM; Stewart LE; Gartside PS; Glueck CJ
Lipids; 1976 Aug; 11(8):628-33. PubMed ID: 184362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Five methods for measuring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in serum compared.
Hoffmann GE; Hiefinger R; Weiss L; Poppe W
Clin Chem; 1985 Oct; 31(10):1729-30. PubMed ID: 4042337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of a modified precipitation method for the measurement of small dense LDL-cholesterol (sd-LDL-C) in a population in southern Brazil.
Cavalcante Lda S; da Silva EL
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2012 Mar; 50(9):1649-56. PubMed ID: 22962227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of two methods for very low density and low density lipoprotein cholesterol determination.
Hoffmann GE; Schleicher E; Weiss L; Hoffmann S
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1982 Jun; 20(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 6956655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vivo rheologic effects of lipid apheresis techniques: comparison of dextran sulfate LDL adsorption and heparin induced LDL precipitation.
Grützmacher P; Landgraf H; Esser R; Okon J; Vlachojannis J; Ehrly AM; Schoeppe W
ASAIO Trans; 1990; 36(3):M327-30. PubMed ID: 2252691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Falsely high high-density lipoprotein triglyceride values by the heparin-manganese precipitation method.
Simo IE; Kiss Z; Ooi TC
Clin Chem; 1988 Oct; 34(10):2127-9. PubMed ID: 3168230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of methods for measurement of apolipoprotein B and cholesterol in low-density lipoproteins.
Vrga L; Contacos C; Li SC; Sullivan DR
Clin Chem; 1997 Feb; 43(2):390-3. PubMed ID: 9023145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of five methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hemodialysis patients(1).
Bairaktari E; Elisaf M; Tzallas C; Karabina SA; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Tsolas O
Clin Biochem; 2001 Nov; 34(8):593-602. PubMed ID: 11849617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Direct measurement of LDL-C in children: performance of two surfactant-based methods in a general pediatric population.
Yu HH; Markowitz R; De Ferranti SD; Neufeld EJ; Farrow G; Bernstein HH; Rifai N
Clin Biochem; 2000 Mar; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10751585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative determination of cholesterol in lipoprotein fractions by electrophoresis.
Contois JH; Gillmor RG; Moore RE; Contois LR; Macer JL; Wu AH
Clin Chim Acta; 1999 Apr; 282(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 10340430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evaluation of the precision of the Friedewald's formula for the calculation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in serum].
Chotkowska E; Kurjata P; Kupść W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2001 Oct; 11(64):348-51. PubMed ID: 11770317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlates of serum lipids and lipoproteins in Congolese patients with arterial hypertension.
Lepira FB; M'Buyamba-Kabangu JR; Kayembe KP; Nseka MN
Cardiovasc J S Afr; 2005; 16(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 16307156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Simplified methods for measuring cholesterol concentrations of high-density lipoprotein subclasses in serum compared.
Whitaker CF; Srinivasan SR; Berenson GS
Clin Chem; 1986 Jul; 32(7):1274-8. PubMed ID: 2424636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A rapid method for separation of plasma low and high density lipoproteins for tocopherol and carotenoid analyses.
Vogel S; Contois JH; Couch SC; Lammi-Keefe CJ
Lipids; 1996 Apr; 31(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 8743055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The plasma lipoproteins as risk factors: comparison of electrophoretic and ultracentrifugation results.
Hulley SB; Rhoads GG
Metabolism; 1982 Aug; 31(8):773-7. PubMed ID: 6954343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of gel permeation chromatography, density gradient ultracentrifugation and precipitation methods for quantitation of very-low-, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Nyyssönen K; Salonen JT
J Chromatogr; 1991 Oct; 570(2):382-9. PubMed ID: 1797853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Changes in plasma lipid and apolipoprotein levels between heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein precipitation (HELP) treatments.
Lane DM; Alaupovic P; Knight-Gibson C; Dudley VS; Laughlin LO
Am J Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 75(16):1124-9. PubMed ID: 7762498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of ultracentrifugation and a precipitation method for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol quantitation in insulin-dependent diabetic patients.
Jensen T; Stender S; Deckert M
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1989 Oct; 49(6):589-93. PubMed ID: 2595251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
