140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6527945)
1. Critical considerations on a comparative study of two staging systems for multiple myeloma.
Merlini G; Jayakar D
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1984; 26(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 6527945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative study of 2 prognostic classification systems for myeloma and examination of the correlation between initial bone marrow plasmacytosis and prognosis. A propos of a homogeneous population of 50 patients followed from diagnosis to death].
Pesce A; Cassuto JP; Grisot C; Gratecos N; Bayle J; Viot G; Dujardin P
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1983; 25(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 6657481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two staging systems for myeloma.
Vercelli D; Cozzolino F; Di Guglielmo R
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1981; 23(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7290984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of five staging systems in 470 patients with multiple myeloma.
Mihou D; Katodritou I; Zervas K
Haematologica; 2006 Aug; 91(8):1149-50. PubMed ID: 16885059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of stratification systems in multiple myeloma. II. Clinical staging systems.
Scudla V; Indrák K
Neoplasma; 1985; 32(4):481-93. PubMed ID: 4047259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.
Scudla V; Zemanova M; Minarik J; Bacovsky J; Ordeltova M; Indrak K; Budikova M; Dusek L; Farbiakova V
Neoplasma; 2006; 53(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 16830053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging as a supplement for the clinical staging system of Durie and Salmon?
Baur A; Stäbler A; Nagel D; Lamerz R; Bartl R; Hiller E; Wendtner C; Bachner F; Reiser M
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1334-45. PubMed ID: 12216103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic factors in IgG and micromolecular multiple myeloma. Retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Colantonio D; Festuccia V; Di Lauro G; Natali G
Minerva Med; 1987 May; 78(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 3587727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system].
Conté L G; Figueroa M G; Lois V V; Cabrera C ME; León R A; García L H; Rojas R H
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jan; 136(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18483648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Chen YB; Hou J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(19):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17935664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA-image cytometry and clinical staging systems in multiple myeloma.
Kropff M; Leo E; Steinfurth G; Esselborn H; Adler CP; Böcking A
Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(5B):2183-8. PubMed ID: 7840520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prognostic analysis and assessment on the clinical staging systems of multiple myeloma--a report of 206 cases].
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Chen YB; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Hou J
Ai Zheng; 2006 Apr; 25(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 16613681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prognostic and therapeutic significance of bone marrow biopsy in multiple myeloma. Analysis of 31 stage II A and III A patients].
Paule B; Quillard J; Medicis P; Bourgeois P; Grossin M; Bisson M; Kahn MF
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic; 1988 Jan; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 3353673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of stratification systems in multiple myeloma. I. Risk categories (good and poor risk).
Scudla V; Indrák K
Neoplasma; 1985; 32(4):469-79. PubMed ID: 4047258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple myeloma: new staging systems for diagnosis, prognosis and response evaluation.
Rajkumar SV; Buadi F
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol; 2007 Dec; 20(4):665-80. PubMed ID: 18070712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reproducibility of a mathematical model for calculating survival in multiple myeloma].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Colantonio D
Medicina (Firenze); 1989; 9(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2811644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Classification, staging and prognostic indices for multiple myeloma].
Hotta T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2161-6. PubMed ID: 18069256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of a morphologic staging method (myeloma progression score) in multiple myeloma].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Collacciani A; Colantonio D
Medicina (Firenze); 1989; 9(3):280-2. PubMed ID: 2615598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system.
Durie BG
Eur J Cancer; 2006 Jul; 42(11):1539-43. PubMed ID: 16777405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prognostic significance of skeletal lesions in multiple myeloma].
Bettini R; Anzani P; Quadrelli CM; Mammano S; Rapazzini P; Marrapodi E; Sessa V
Recenti Prog Med; 1989 Jun; 80(6):300-3. PubMed ID: 2672192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
