145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6528330)
1. [Possibilities for reducing radiation exposure during radiography of small animals].
Hartung K; Münzer B
Tierarztl Prax; 1984; 12(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 6528330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interventional radiologists: a necessary evolution of leaded protective aprons design.
Guersen J; Cassagnes L; Mechin G; Ravel A; Dumousset E; Boyer L; Chabrot P
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):443. PubMed ID: 23433419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Estimation of the occupational radiation exposure during radiographic studies of horses].
Hartung K; Münzer B
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1991 Oct; 104(10):347-51. PubMed ID: 1755822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiation protection in small animal veterinary practice].
Hartung K; Münzer B
Tierarztl Prax; 1981; 9(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 7348956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. SURVEY OF X-RAY PROTECTION PRACTICES AMONG MICHIGAN VETERINARIANS.
JACOBSON GA; VANFAROWE DE
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1964 Oct; 145():793-7. PubMed ID: 14219641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Exposure doses of x-radiation incurred during veterinary diagnostic radiological examinations.
Dixon RT
Aust Vet J; 1968 Jul; 44(7):299-303. PubMed ID: 5668175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of the dose to persons assisting when X-radiation is used in medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine.
Hupe O; Ankerhold U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):478-81. PubMed ID: 21062800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation safety.
Morgan JP; Silverman S; Zontine WJ
Mod Vet Pract; 1978 Oct; 59(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 739969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Shielding during dental X-ray examinations. Effectiveness of radiation protection measures for patients during X-ray examinations].
Roth J
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(11):1151-7. PubMed ID: 17144626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. X-ray hazards in practices.
O'Riordan MC
Vet Rec; 1970 Nov; 87(21):640-3. PubMed ID: 5530332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of occupational radiation dose in staff at the cardiac catheterisation laboratory by protective material placed on the patient.
Ordiales JM; Nogales JM; Sánchez-Casanueva R; Vano E; Fernández JM; Álvarez FJ; Ramos J; Martínez G; López-Mínguez JR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):272-5. PubMed ID: 25848096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Radiation protection in diagnostic radiology].
Mini R
Ther Umsch; 1992 Jun; 49(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 1636159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Techniques for radiation protection in the radiography of small animals].
Weaver MP; Rudorf H
Tierarztl Prax; 1994 Feb; 22(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 8165664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [When will x-ray diagnostic examination result in occupational radiation exposure? (author's transl)].
Ewen K; Stender F
Rontgenblatter; 1980 Mar; 33(3):119-28. PubMed ID: 7361028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attenuation of X and Gamma Rays in Personal Radiation Shielding Protective Clothing.
Kozlovska M; Cerny R; Otahal P
Health Phys; 2015 Nov; 109(3 Suppl 3):S205-11. PubMed ID: 26425983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Procedures, spectrum and radiation exposure in CT-fluoroscopy].
Stoeckelhuber BM; Schulz E; Melchert UH; Blobel J; Gellissen J; Gehl H; Weiss HD; Leibecke T
Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 14618963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel complete radiation protection system eliminates physician radiation exposure and leaded aprons.
Fattal P; Goldstein JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 22926976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Radiation exposure of urologists].
Rothe W
Z Urol Nephrol; 1977 Jul; 70(7):479-82. PubMed ID: 906680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. X-Ray protective clothing: does DIN 6857-1 allow an objective comparison between lead-free and lead-composite materials?
Eder H; Schlattl H; Hoeschen C
Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 20143286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
