These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6530840)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus contrast on binocular VER.
    Katsumi O; Oguchi Y; Kawara T; Peli E
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1984; 28(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 6530840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pattern reversal VER as a tool for evaluating unbalanced visual inputs between the two eyes.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T; Uemura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1988; 32(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 3411817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Dawson WW; Compton JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Mar; 22(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 7061211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual evoked potentials to red-green stimulation in schoolchildren.
    Pompe MT; Kranjc BS; Brecelj J
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):447-51. PubMed ID: 16961979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of aniseikonia on binocular function.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 Apr; 27(4):601-4. PubMed ID: 3957580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    James AC; Ruseckaite R; Maddess T
    Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15842740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Arvind H; Klistorner A; Graham S; Grigg J; Goldberg I; Klistorner A; Billson FA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems.
    Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1522-31. PubMed ID: 18501948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cerebral evoked potentials: a historical review of the marseilles contributions and a preliminary report on a study of the effects of various stimulus parameters on the P90 component of the pattern visual evoked potential.
    Low MD; Purves SJ; Reeves B; Galloway J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1982; (35):369-79. PubMed ID: 6749480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensemble cortical responses to rival visual stimuli: effect of monocular transient.
    Wen Y; Zhang Q
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2009 Feb; 380(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19167358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of number of elements and size of stimulus field on recordability of pattern reversal visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tsukada T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1988 Jun; 29(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 3372166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective evaluation of binocular function with pattern reversal VER. III. Effect of stimulus size and localization.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Dec; 64(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 3811882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response. II. Effect of mean luminosity.
    Katsumi O; Tanino T; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Apr; 64(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 3727960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants.
    Brown RJ; Candy TR; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(13):3324-33. PubMed ID: 10586959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binocular exposure causes suppression of the less experienced eye in cats previously reared with unequal alternating monocular exposure.
    Tumosa N; Nunberg S; Hirsch HV; Tieman SB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1983 Apr; 24(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 6832919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photic-induced sensitization: eye-specific neural plasticity and effect of behavioral state.
    Manning KA; Galganski LA; Uhlrich DJ
    Neuroscience; 2007 May; 146(3):1413-24. PubMed ID: 17391857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binocular interaction studied with visual evoked responses (VER) in humans with normal or impaired binocular vision.
    Lennerstrand G
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1978; 56(4):628-37. PubMed ID: 735771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual evoked responses to pattern-reversal: the signal-to-noise ratio.
    Peregrin J; Valach M; Vít F; Kuba M
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1984; 33(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 6484026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities.
    Hale J; Harrad RA; McKee SP; Pettet MW; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1786-90. PubMed ID: 15851583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.