These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6531595)

  • 1. [Is it legitimate today to perform large rotations with forceps?].
    Magnin P; Audra P
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Apr; 79(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 6531595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Immediate materno-fetal morbidity in the use of forceps. Comparative study of divergent and crossed forceps].
    Walss Rodríguez RJ; Casillas Cantú A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 May; 52(325):121-5. PubMed ID: 6489800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rotational forceps in midforceps delivery.
    Dyack C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jul; 56(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 7383477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Obstetric fractures.
    Nadas S; Reinberg O
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1992 Jun; 2(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 1498109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Forceps, vacuum suction and cesarean section from the point of view of the neonatologist].
    Malaguzzi Valeri O; Ottaviano S
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10602689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of "instrument-associated" and "spontaneous" obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68 neonates.
    Dupuis O; Silveira R; Dupont C; Mottolese C; Kahn P; Dittmar A; Rudigoz RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 15672020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Vacuum extraction from pelvic entrance].
    Feuerstein H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1968 Dec; 90(49):1663-72. PubMed ID: 5751387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed forceps.
    Boyd ME; Usher RH; McLean FH; Norman BE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 68(6):779-83. PubMed ID: 3785789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Fetal injuries in forceps delivery].
    Tallián F; Puskás E; Hernády A; Szegedy L; Tomka I
    Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung; 1965; 6(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 5858775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section.
    Bhide A; Guven M; Prefumo F; Vankalayapati P; Thilaganathan B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jul; 20(7):541-5. PubMed ID: 17674268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.
    Meyer L; Mailloux J; Marcoux S; Blanchet P; Meyer F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 3439447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the obstetric forceps.
    Mines JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Nov; 36(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 5473995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Improved Bamberg divergence forceps. Modification for the prevention of soft tissue injuries of the pelvis].
    Krieglsteiner P; Krone HA; von Zeppelin D
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Dec; 44(12):821-3. PubMed ID: 6570120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The parallel obstetrical forceps: reducing injuries during delivery. II.
    Shute WB
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1973; 19(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 4710963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of assisted labor on the fetal vascular system. IV. Comparative observation between the use of obstetrical forceps and obstetrical vacuum extraction].
    Neme B; Fermann D; Salomão AJ; Fraga E
    Matern Infanc (Sao Paulo); 1972; 31(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 5049150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the morbidity of midforceps and cesarean delivery.
    Bashore RA; Phillips WH; Brinkman CR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1428-34; discussion 1434-5. PubMed ID: 2360575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.