188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6534190)
1. Employment discrimination implications of genetic screening in the workplace under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act.
Canter EF
Am J Law Med; 1984; 10(3):323-47. PubMed ID: 6534190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Furnish HA
Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic testing in the workplace.
Rowinski L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal recourse for the cancer patient-returnee: the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Sigel CJ
Am J Law Med; 1984; 10(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 6534189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic discrimination in the workplace: an overview of existing protections.
Kaufmann MB
Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1999; 30(3):393-438. PubMed ID: 11658078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrimination in employment--remedies--standards governing backpay awards for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Piraino MS
Cornell Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 61(3):460-77. PubMed ID: 10242508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Disability discrimination in the health care workplace.
Benesch K
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(3):45-8. PubMed ID: 11652976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Birth defects caused by parental exposure to workplace hazards: the interface of Title VII with OSHA and tort law.
Darcy L
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1979; 12(2):237-60. PubMed ID: 11665121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline.
Wasson RP
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there a pink slip in my gene? Genetic discrimination in the workplace.
Miller PS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):225-65. PubMed ID: 15015481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Discriminatory aspects of medical screening.
Rothstein MA
J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):924-9. PubMed ID: 3772548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AIDS in the workplace: public and corporate policy.
Heacock MV; Orvis GP
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(2):689-713. PubMed ID: 11656268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new "right" and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level.
Hathaway KA
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2002; 52(1):133-77. PubMed ID: 16493794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy.
Doot GM
Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological monitoring: the employer's dilemma.
Miller FH
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):388-426. PubMed ID: 11644166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic testing in employment situations. A question of worker rights.
Diamond AL
J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):231-56. PubMed ID: 6604120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Employment discrimination: procedures for handling complaints--Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1981 Apr; 46(74):22395-9. PubMed ID: 10250889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Employment discrimination against persons with AIDS.
Leonard AS
Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1985; 10(3):681-703. PubMed ID: 11651852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
