These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6535102)

  • 1. Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Gwynne JW
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Dec; 36(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 6535102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.
    Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 1982 Apr; 14(2):247-79. PubMed ID: 7083803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Boroughs JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 May; 35(5):451-63. PubMed ID: 6462872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some evidence for correlated separate activation in a simple letter-detection task.
    van der Heijden AH; Schreuder R; Maris L; Neerincx M
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Dec; 36(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 6535104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual texture segregation based on orientation and hue.
    Callaghan TC; Lasaga MI; Garner WR
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Jan; 39(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 3703659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns.
    Kimchi R
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Feb; 43(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 3340518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of stimulus degradation on category search.
    Prinz W; Meinecke C; Hielscher M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1987 Feb; 64(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 3591450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectancy and frequency effects on perceptual and motor systems in choice reaction time.
    Miller J; Anbar R
    Mem Cognit; 1981 Nov; 9(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 7329244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absence of distracting information explains the redundant signals effect for a centrally presented categorization task.
    Mishler AD; Neider MB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Nov; 181():18-26. PubMed ID: 29028518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 May; 41(5):419-34. PubMed ID: 3601624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When redundancy hurts letter detection: an attempt to define one condition.
    Johnson NF; Blum AJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Feb; 43(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 3340513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An interactive race model of divided attention.
    Mordkoff JT; Yantis S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):520-38. PubMed ID: 1830090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the detection of letters within redundant arrays.
    Johnson NF
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3763365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facilitation and interference with a separable redundant dimension in stimulus comparison.
    Garner WR
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 3226879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Search time as a function of context letter frequency.
    Latimer CR
    Perception; 1972; 1(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 4680926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task.
    Harms L; Bundesen C
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Jan; 33(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 6844088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Is figural perception indeed additive?].
    Drösler J
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1986; 33(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 3751161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what?
    Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The letter-frequency effect and the generality of familiarity effects on perception.
    Appelman IB; Mayzner MS
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Nov; 30(5):436-46. PubMed ID: 7036082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Searching for multiple targets simultaneously: is it really possible?
    Holmes DL; Peper R; Olsho LW; Raney DE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Feb; 46(1):227-34. PubMed ID: 643479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.