165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6535981)
1. Binocular cues in the perception of distance of a point source of light.
Morrison JD; Whiteside TC
Perception; 1984; 13(5):555-66. PubMed ID: 6535981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accommodation, convergence, and distance perception in low illumination.
Owens DA; Liebowitz HW
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1980 Sep; 57(9):540-50. PubMed ID: 7425076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distance perception within near visual space.
Viguier A; Clément G; Trotter Y
Perception; 2001; 30(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 11257974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of perceived distance on accommodation under binocular steady-state conditions.
Kotulak JC; Morse SE
Vision Res; 1995 Mar; 35(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7740770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation.
Schor CM; Alexander J; Cormack L; Stevenson S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):307-18. PubMed ID: 1454368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ordinal depth information from accommodation?
Mon-Williams M; Tresilian JR
Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):391-404. PubMed ID: 10755661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of luminance on the relation between accommodation and convergence.
Jiang BC; Gish KW; Leibowitz HW
Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Mar; 68(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 2047085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decreased accommodation during decompensation of distance exotropia.
Horwood AM; Riddell PM
Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 96(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 21873311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Errors in distance appreciation and binocular night vision.
Bourdy C; Cottin F; Monot A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Oct; 11(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 1771071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Convergence responses to monocularly viewed objects: implications for distance perception.
Predebon J
Perception; 1994; 23(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 7971108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic demonstration of proximal vergence and proximal accommodation.
Wick B; Currie D
Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Mar; 68(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 2047076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance.
Gogel WC
Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):477-97. PubMed ID: 4660703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex.
Quinlan DJ; Culham JC
Neuroimage; 2007 May; 36(1):167-87. PubMed ID: 17398117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relation between distance heterophoria and tonic vergence.
O'Shea WF; Ciuffreda KJ; Fisher SK; Tannen B; Super P
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Oct; 65(10):787-93. PubMed ID: 3207149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of accommodation.
Currie DC; Manny RE
Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(11):1525-33. PubMed ID: 9205713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Size constancy and angular size matching in size perception of near objects.
Koh LH; Charman WN
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 10333187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereoacuity at distance and near.
Wong BP; Woods RL; Peli E
Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):771-8. PubMed ID: 12512685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Familiar size affects the perceived size and distance of real objects even with binocular vision.
Maltz MV; Stubbs KM; Quinlan DJ; Rzepka AM; Martin JR; Culham JC
J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):21. PubMed ID: 34581767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time course and decay of effects of near work on tonic accommodation and tonic vergence.
Wolf KS; Ciuffreda KJ; Jacobs SE
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 3658435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
