These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6536127)

  • 41. Temperature rise generated by a focussed Gaussian beam in a two-layer medium.
    Wu J; Nyborg WL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1992; 18(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 1595135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determination of the nonlinearity parameter B/A of biological media.
    Law WK; Frizzell LA; Dunn F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(2):307-18. PubMed ID: 4035807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in fixed trabecular bone using broadband pulses and single-frequency tone bursts.
    Strelitzki R; Clarke AJ; Evans JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):743-53. PubMed ID: 8730667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Determination of acoustic nonlinearity parameter (β) using nonlinear resonance ultrasound spectroscopy: Theory and experiment.
    Chakrapani SK; Barnard DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):919. PubMed ID: 28253660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Describing small-scale structure in random media using pulse-echo ultrasound.
    Insana MF; Wagner RF; Brown DG; Hall TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jan; 87(1):179-92. PubMed ID: 2299033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Finite element modeling of nonlinear acoustics/ultrasonics for the detection of closed delaminations in composites.
    Singh AK; Chen BY; Tan VB; Tay TE; Lee HP
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Feb; 74():89-98. PubMed ID: 27764651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Adaptive control of contrast agent microbubbles for shell parameter identification.
    Dadok V; Szeri AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2579-86. PubMed ID: 22501039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of bubble shell nonlinearity on ultrasound nonlinear propagation through microbubble populations.
    Tang MX; Loughran J; Stride E; Zhang D; Eckersley RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 21428471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Full wave modeling of therapeutic ultrasound: efficient time-domain implementation of the frequency power-law attenuation.
    Liebler M; Ginter S; Dreyer T; Riedlinger RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):2742-50. PubMed ID: 15603120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Attenuation of ultrasonic noise in the 10-16 kHz frequency range by earplugs].
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Med Pr; 2018 Aug; 69(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 29953113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Spectral characterization and attenuation measurements in ultrasound.
    Flax SW; Pelc NJ; Glover GH; Gutmann FD; McLachlan M
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):95-116. PubMed ID: 6683894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Error bounds on ultrasonic scatterer size estimates.
    Chaturvedi P; Insana MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):392-9. PubMed ID: 8675835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of two theoretical models for predicting non-linear propagation in medical ultrasound fields.
    Bacon DR; Baker AC
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1633-43. PubMed ID: 2685835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of velocity and shear rate measurements using pulsed Doppler ultrasound: a comparison of signal analysis techniques.
    Markou CP; Ku DN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(8):803-14. PubMed ID: 1808798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A theoretical investigation of chirp insonification of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Barlow E; Mulholland AJ; Gachagan A; Nordon A
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21420138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modification of spectra of pulses from ultrasonic transducers by scatters in non-attenuating and in attenuating media.
    Round WH; Bates RH
    Ultrason Imaging; 1987 Jan; 9(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 3603895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Investigation of a model for estimating the attenuation of ultrasonic signals.
    Salomonsson G; Claesson I; Holmer NG
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1984 Nov; 22(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 6390011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comments on 'The effect of logarithmic compression on the estimation of the Nakagami parameter for ultrasonic tissue characterization'.
    Shankar PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):L23-6; author reply L27-9. PubMed ID: 16585833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.
    Doinikov AA; Haac JF; Dayton PA
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Feb; 49(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18990417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Attenuation estimation on phantoms--a stability test.
    He P; Greenleaf JF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1986 Jan; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3521042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.