These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6539806)

  • 1. Induction by reinforcer schedules.
    Cohen PS; Looney TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 6539806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude.
    DeGrandpre RJ; Bickel WK; Hughes JR; Layng MP; Badger G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Nov; 60(3):641-66. PubMed ID: 8283154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observing behavior: effects of rate and magnitude of primary reinforcement.
    Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Sep; 78(2):161-78. PubMed ID: 12216976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of adding a second reinforcement alternative: implications for Herrnstein's interpretation of r(e).
    Soto PL; McDowell JJ; Dallery J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):185-225. PubMed ID: 16262186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal patterns of reinforcer-induced general activity and attack in pigeons.
    Campagnoni FR; Lawler CP; Cohen PS
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 37(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 3749322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rats show molar sensitivity to different aspects of random-interval-with-linear-feedback-functions and random-ratio schedules.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):432-43. PubMed ID: 25915752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of schedule, percent body weight, and magnitude of reinforcer on acquisition of schedule-induced polydipsia.
    Freed EX; Hymowitz N
    Psychol Rep; 1972 Aug; 31(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 5055926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on skill acquisition for children with autism.
    Kocher CP; Howard MR; Fienup DM
    Behav Modif; 2015 Jul; 39(4):600-21. PubMed ID: 25896361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and distribution on preference for work schedules.
    Ward-Horner JC; Pittenger A; Pace G; Fienup DM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):623-7. PubMed ID: 24825241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aggression as a reinforcer: operant behavor in the mouse-killing rat.
    Van Hemel PE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Mar; 17(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 5062954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcer concentration effects on a fixed-interval schedule.
    Blomeley FJ; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15182926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with dynamic reinforcement rates decreases resistance to extinction.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Mar; 105(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 26813330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on reinforced behavioral variability.
    Doughty AH; Giorno KG; Miller HL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Nov; 100(3):355-69. PubMed ID: 24122484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reply to Pellón and Killeen's (2015) commentary on Boakes, Patterson, Kendig, and Harris (2015).
    Boakes RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):452-3. PubMed ID: 26437385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.
    Vicars SM; Miguel CF; Sobie JL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():75-83. PubMed ID: 24270051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral effects of intra-cranial self-stimulation in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 15922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.