These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6540335)

  • 1. A comparison of two conditioning procedures in the use of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA).
    Thompson G; Folsom RC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 6540335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Visual reinforcement audiometry with different sound stimuli in children].
    Vieira EP; Azevedo MF
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 17710345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of audiometric test methods for 2-year-old children.
    Thompson M; Thompson G; Vethivelu S
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 May; 54(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 2709835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of reinforcer duration on the response behavior of preterm 2-year-olds in visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Culpepper B; Thompson G
    Ear Hear; 1994 Apr; 15(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 8020648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants.
    Parry G; Hacking C; Bamford J; Day J
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 14582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brief clinical report on visual reinforcement audiometry with deaf infants.
    Rudmin FW
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Dec; 13(6):367-9. PubMed ID: 6544853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of initial stimulus type for visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Shaw P; Nikolopoulos T
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Apr; 43(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 15250123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) to low-functioning children.
    Thompson G; Wilson WR; Moore JM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 423558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A longitudinal study comparing responses of hearing-impaired infants to pure tones using visual reinforcement and play audiometry.
    Talbott CB
    Ear Hear; 1987 Jun; 8(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 3609514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of some clinical features of visual reinforcement audiometry and the distraction test.
    Gliddon ML; Martin AM; Green R
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Dec; 33(6):355-65. PubMed ID: 10656597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory responsiveness of premature infants utilizing visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA).
    Moore JM; Thompson G; Folsom RC
    Ear Hear; 1992 Jun; 13(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 1397759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response strength of young children in operant audiometry.
    Primus MA; Thompson G
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):539-47. PubMed ID: 4087889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence on the efficacy of insert earphone and sound field VRA with young infants.
    Day J; Bamford J; Parry G; Shepherd M; Quigley A
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 11201319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infant thresholds with enhanced attention to the signal in visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Primus MA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 3172766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An innovation in insert visual reinforcement audiometry in children.
    Jayarajan V; Nandi R; Caldicott B
    J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Feb; 119(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 15829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with the audiologic assessment of infants and toddlers.
    Gravel JS; Traquina DN
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1992 Jan; 23(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 1592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: results of visual reinforcement audiometry.
    Widen JE; Johnson JL; White KR; Gravel JS; Vohr BR; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Weirather Y; Meyer S
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Dec; 14(2):S200-16. PubMed ID: 16489864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of auditory brainstem response and behavioral audiometry in infants.
    Ruth RA; Horner JS; McCoy GS; Chandler CR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 17():94-8. PubMed ID: 6577570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual reinforcement audiometry using digital video disc and conventional reinforcers.
    Schmida MJ; Peterson HJ; Tharpe AM
    Am J Audiol; 2003 Jun; 12(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12894866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.