These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6540587)

  • 1. Modulation of turning preferences by learning.
    Glick SD; Hinds PA
    Behav Brain Res; 1984 Jun; 12(3):335-7. PubMed ID: 6540587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Operant control of turning in circles: a new model of dopaminergic drug action.
    Glick SD
    Brain Res; 1982 Aug; 245(2):394-7. PubMed ID: 6889903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reversal of amphetamine-induced circling preference in trained circling rats.
    Yamamoto BK; Freed CR
    Life Sci; 1984 Feb; 34(7):675-82. PubMed ID: 6538253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trained and amphetamine-induced circling behavior in lesioned, transplanted rats.
    Richards JB; Sabol KE; Kriek EH; Freed CR
    J Neural Transplant Plast; 1993; 4(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 8110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning.
    Spyraki C; Fibiger HC; Phillips AG
    Brain Res; 1982 Dec; 253(1-2):185-93. PubMed ID: 6817850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference.
    Swerdlow NR; Koob GF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1984; 84(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 6438675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre- and post-synaptic actions of apomorphine: differentiation by rotatory effects in normal rats.
    Glick SD; Jerussi TP; Cox RD; Fleisher LN
    Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1977 Feb; 225(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 557962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased response switching, perseveration and perseverative switching following d-amphetamine in the rat.
    Evenden JL; Robbins TW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1983; 80(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6408674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule.
    Mendrek A; Blaha CD; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1998 Feb; 135(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 9539267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nocturnal rotation in normal rats: correlation with amphetamine-induced rotation and effects of nigrostriatal lesions.
    Glick SD; Cox RD
    Brain Res; 1978 Jul; 150(1):149-61. PubMed ID: 566609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right-sided population bias and lateralization of activity in normal rats.
    Glick SD; Ross DA
    Brain Res; 1981 Jan; 205(1):222-5. PubMed ID: 7193500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methylphenidate and d-amphetamine: effects and interactions with alphamethyltyrosine and tetrabenazine on DRL performance in rats.
    Seiden LS; Andresen J; MacPhail RC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Apr; 10(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 572553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regional changes in brain dopamine and serotonin metabolism induced by conditioned circling in rats: effects of water deprivation, learning and individual differences in asymmetry.
    Glick SD; Carlson JN
    Brain Res; 1989 Dec; 504(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 2598025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation between motor asymmetry and direction of rotational behaviour under amphetamine and apomorphine in rats with unilateral degeneration of the nigrostriatal dopamine system.
    Ziegler MG; Szechtman H
    Behav Brain Res; 1990 Jul; 39(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 2390196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioned rotation: a behavioral analysis.
    Richards JB; Sabol KE; Freed CR
    Physiol Behav; 1990 Jun; 47(6):1083-7. PubMed ID: 2395913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loss of tolerance to amphetamine-induced hypophagia in rats: homeostatic readjustment vs. instrumental learning.
    Hughes KM; Popi L; Wolgin DL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Sep; 64(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 10495014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-specific tolerance to d-amphetamine.
    Emmett-Oglesby MW; Spencer DG; Wood DM; Lal H
    Neuropharmacology; 1984 May; 23(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 6738825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of the effects of amphetamine on brain self-stimulation behavior.
    Schaefer GJ; Michael RP
    Behav Brain Res; 1988 Jul; 29(1-2):93-101. PubMed ID: 3261172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experiential constraints on the development of tolerance to amphetamine hypophagia following sensitization of stereotypy: instrumental contingencies regulate the expression of sensitization.
    Hughes KM; Popi L; Wolgin DL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1998 Dec; 140(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 9888620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interaction of d-amphetamine and naloxone differs for rats trained on separate fixed-interval or fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.
    Andrews JS; Holtzman SG
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1987 Jan; 26(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 3562487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.