These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6542563)

  • 1. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
    Gaugler HR; Buchanan DS; Hintz RL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive performance for four breeds of swine: crossbred females and purebred and crossbred boars.
    Buchanan DS; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):948-56. PubMed ID: 6511683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three-breed and backcross swine for litter productivity and postweaning performance.
    Wilson ER; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 7240036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A genetic analysis of sow productivity traits.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1149-63. PubMed ID: 6542565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for sow productivity.
    Irvin KM; Swiger LA
    J Anim Sci; 1984 May; 58(5):1144-50. PubMed ID: 6539771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproductive performance of purebred landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand with special reference to seasonal influence and parity number.
    Tantasuparuk W; Lundeheim N; Dalin AM; Kunavongkrit A; Einarsson S
    Theriogenology; 2000 Aug; 54(3):481-96. PubMed ID: 11051330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of the relationship between the estrogen receptor gene and reproductive traits in swine.
    Isler BJ; Irvin KM; Neal SM; Moeller SJ; Davis ME
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2334-9. PubMed ID: 12350010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. II. Reproductive performance of purebred females producing purebred and two-way cross litters and performance of purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 6674283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproduction of 3/4 White Composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing, or 1/4 Minzhu gilts and sows.
    Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1559-67. PubMed ID: 9655575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of rabbit breed types for postweaning litter growth, feed efficiency, and survival performance traits.
    Ozimba CE; Lukefahr SD
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Sep; 69(9):3494-500. PubMed ID: 1938636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of crossbreeding on genetic improvement of growth and reproduction in pigs.
    Hale OM; Bondari K
    Growth; 1986; 50(4):526-36. PubMed ID: 3596329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of additive genetic, maternal and specific combining abilities for some litter traits of swine.
    Jungst SB; Kuhlers DL
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1140-8. PubMed ID: 6542564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal performance of Duroc, Hampshire and Landrace backcross gilts fed normal and high fiber diets during postweaning growth.
    Stewart TS; Drewry KJ
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Sep; 57(3):565-76. PubMed ID: 6313586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc, Hampshire and Spot backcross sows.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Mar; 60(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 4039311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterosis and recombination effects in Hampshire and Landrace swine: I. Maternal traits.
    Baas TJ; Christian LL; Rothschild MF
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 1582925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
    Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: I. Effects of ram breed on productivity of ewes of two crossbred populations.
    Freking BA; Leymaster KA; Young LD
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jun; 78(6):1422-9. PubMed ID: 10875622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc-Landrace, Yorkshire-Landrace and Hampshire-Landrace sows managed in two types of gestation systems: pig performance.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB; Little JA
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Oct; 67(10):2595-602. PubMed ID: 2808165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.