These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6542565)

  • 1. A genetic analysis of sow productivity traits.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1149-63. PubMed ID: 6542565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits.
    Ferguson PW; Harvey WR; Irvin KM
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Feb; 60(2):375-84. PubMed ID: 4039308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic correlations of pig performance and sow productivity traits.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Dec; 59(6):1477-87. PubMed ID: 6526756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters.
    Gaugler HR; Buchanan DS; Hintz RL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Oct; 59(4):941-7. PubMed ID: 6542563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for sow productivity.
    Irvin KM; Swiger LA
    J Anim Sci; 1984 May; 58(5):1144-50. PubMed ID: 6539771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of additive genetic, maternal and specific combining abilities for some litter traits of swine.
    Jungst SB; Kuhlers DL
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1140-8. PubMed ID: 6542564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line National Genetic Evaluation Program: a comparison of six maternal genetic lines for female productivity measures over four parities.
    Moeller SJ; Goodwin RN; Johnson RK; Mabry JW; Baas TJ; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 82(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 14753347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.
    Putz AM; Tiezzi F; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Knauer MT
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Nov; 93(11):5153-63. PubMed ID: 26641035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. I. Selection applied and genetic change in reproduction of crossbred gilts.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1418-30. PubMed ID: 6674282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for pig growth and body composition estimated by intraclass correlation and parent-offspring regression.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1987 Jun; 64(6):1619-29. PubMed ID: 3597177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. II. Reproductive performance of purebred females producing purebred and two-way cross litters and performance of purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 6674283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs.
    Chen P; Baas TJ; Mabry JW; Koehler KJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12597371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population parameter estimates for performance and reproductive traits in Polish Large White nucleus herds.
    Kaplon MJ; Rothschild MF; Berger PJ; Healey M
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jan; 69(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 2005041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting preweaning pig weights to a standard age.
    Bereskin B; Norton HW
    J Anim Sci; 1982 Feb; 54(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 7076587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three-breed and backcross swine for litter productivity and postweaning performance.
    Wilson ER; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 7240036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in connectedness groups of Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire pigs in China.
    Zhang S; Zhang J; Olasege BS; Ma P; Qiu X; Gao H; Wang C; Wang Y; Zhang Q; Yang H; Wang Z; Ding X; Pan Y
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Mar; 137(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31468579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.
    Holl JW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):624-9. PubMed ID: 12661642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heritability and genetic correlation estimates of semen production traits with litter traits and pork production traits in purebred Duroc pigs.
    Ogawa S; Kimata M; Tomiyama M; Satoh M
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Mar; 100(3):. PubMed ID: 35201314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.