These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6542771)

  • 1. Sex differences in bone resorption: a scanning electron microscopic study of mouse parietal bones.
    Abe K; Kanno T; Kitao K; Schneider GB
    Arch Histol Jpn; 1984 Oct; 47(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 6542771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Age-related changes and sex differences in bone resorption in the mouse femur: a light and scanning electron microscopic study].
    Aoki Y
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1986 May; 61(3):399-411. PubMed ID: 3744289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface structures and osteoclasts of mouse parietal bones: a light and scanning electron microscopic study.
    Abe K; Kanno T; Schneider GB
    Arch Histol Jpn; 1983 Dec; 46(5):663-76. PubMed ID: 6673690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological relationships between osteoclasts and bone resorption surfaces on mouse parietal bones.
    Abe K; Ohno K; Hasegawa K
    Arch Histol Cytol; 1990 Mar; 53(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2364014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry.
    Ren S; Takano H; Abe K
    Arch Histol Cytol; 2005 Jun; 68(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 16079456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The preosteoclast and its cytodifferentiation into the osteoclast: ultrastructural and histochemical studies of rat fetal parietal bone.
    Ejiri S
    Arch Histol Jpn; 1983 Sep; 46(4):533-57. PubMed ID: 6661003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone resorption by isolated osteoclasts in living versus devitalized bone: differences in mode and extent and the effects of human recombinant tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases.
    Shimizu H; Sakamoto M; Sakamoto S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1990 Apr; 5(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 2343781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early scanning electron microscopic studies of hard tissue resorption: their relation to current concepts reviewed.
    Boyde A; Jones SJ
    Scanning Microsc; 1987 Mar; 1(1):369-81. PubMed ID: 3589611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Two types of bone resorption lacunae: a scanning electron microscopic and histochemical study].
    Ren S
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 2003 May; 78(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 12795177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron microscopic and light microscopic observations on morphological changes of freeze-dried bone implantation in rats: comparison with fresh autogenous bone transplantation.
    Matsuda M; Satoh Y; Ono K
    Histol Histopathol; 1992 Jul; 7(3):393-403. PubMed ID: 1504459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphological evidence of reduced bone resorption in the osteosclerotic (oc) mouse.
    Seifert MF; Marks SC
    Am J Anat; 1985 Feb; 172(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 3976544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. S 12911-2 inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption in vitro.
    Takahashi N; Sasaki T; Tsouderos Y; Suda T
    J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1082-7. PubMed ID: 12817762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrastructural features of osteoclasts in situ.
    de Saint-Georges L; Miller SC; Bowman BM; Jee WS
    Scanning Microsc; 1989 Dec; 3(4):1201-5; discussion 1205-6. PubMed ID: 2633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of osteoclast resorption pits on bone with titanium and zirconia surfaces.
    Hefti T; Frischherz M; Spencer ND; Hall H; Schlottig F
    Biomaterials; 2010 Oct; 31(28):7321-31. PubMed ID: 20609470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning electron microscopic study of the human auditory ossicles.
    Chen H; Okumura T; Emura S; Shoumura S
    Ann Anat; 2008; 190(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 18342143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex differences in bone resorption in the mouse femur. A light- and scanning electron-microscopic study.
    Abe K; Aoki Y
    Cell Tissue Res; 1989 Jan; 255(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 2736602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphological evidence of reduced bone resorption in osteopetrotic (op) mice.
    Marks SC
    Am J Anat; 1982 Feb; 163(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 7072615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanning electrochemical microscopy at the surface of bone-resorbing osteoclasts: evidence for steady-state disposal and intracellular functional compartmentalization of calcium.
    Berger CE; Rathod H; Gillespie JI; Horrocks BR; Datta HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2092-102. PubMed ID: 11697806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of dichloromethylene diphosphonate, a pyrophosphate analog, on bone and bone cell structure in the growing rat.
    Miller SC; Jee WS
    Anat Rec; 1979 Mar; 193(3):439-62. PubMed ID: 154858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrastructural localization of concanavalin-A binding sites on bone cells: effects of con A on osteoclastic bone resorption.
    Popoff SN; Schneider GB
    Scan Electron Microsc; 1983; (Pt 2):959-67. PubMed ID: 6635581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.