These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6543284)

  • 1. Zygosity testing: laboratory and the investigator's judgment.
    Segal NL
    Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1984; 33(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 6543284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appraisal of parental bias in twin studies. Ascribed zygosity and IQ differences in twins.
    Matheny AP
    Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1979; 28(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 575748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bloodtyping and twin zygosity: reassessment and extension.
    Wilson RS
    Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1980; 29(2):103-20. PubMed ID: 7020319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining zygosity in the Vietnam Era Twin Registry: an approach using questionnaires.
    Eisen S; Neuman R; Goldberg J; Rice J; True W
    Clin Genet; 1989 Jun; 35(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 2736790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The determination of twin zygosity by means of a mailed questionnaire.
    Torgersen S
    Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1979; 28(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 297423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Practical evaluation of some discriminant criteria for the dermatoglyphic diagnosis of twin zygosity].
    Rorive C; Buts R; Dodinval P
    J Genet Hum; 1982 Jun; 30(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 6890094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Use of the integral parameter of dermatoglyphic differences for determining the type of zygosity of twins].
    Finogenova SA; Gindilis VM
    Genetika; 1976; 12(9):128-38. PubMed ID: 1034584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting zygosity in Norwegian twin pairs born 1915-1960.
    Magnus P; Berg K; Nance WE
    Clin Genet; 1983 Aug; 24(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 6577993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of the zygosity questionnaire and characteristics of zygosity-misdiagnosed twin pairs in the Healthy Twin Study of Korea.
    Song YM; Lee D; Lee MK; Lee K; Lee HJ; Hong EJ; Han B; Sung J
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2010 Jun; 13(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20477720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The determination of zygosity--a study of 608 pairs of twins born in Aberdeen.
    Nylander PP
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1970 Jun; 77(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 5463315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a telephone zygosity questionnaire in twins of known zygosity.
    Peeters H; Van Gestel S; Vlietinck R; Derom C; Derom R
    Behav Genet; 1998 May; 28(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 9670591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The diagnosis of zygosity in twins.
    Lykken DT
    Behav Genet; 1978 Sep; 8(5):437-73. PubMed ID: 570035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The zygosity diagnosis of Japanese twins by dermatoglyphic features (author's transl)].
    Asaka A
    Jinrui Idengaku Zasshi; 1976 Sep; 21(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 1035339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative diagnoses of twin zygosity by SSLP variant analysis, questionnaire, and dermatoglyphic analysis.
    Spitz E; Moutier R; Reed T; Busnel MC; Marchaland C; Roubertoux PL; Carlier M
    Behav Genet; 1996 Jan; 26(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 8852732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Definitive Zygosity Scores in the Peas in the Pod Questionnaire is a Sensitive and Accurate Assessment of the Zygosity of Adult Twins.
    Jarrar ZA; Ward KJ; Mangino M; Cherkas LF; Gill R; Gillham-Nasenya I; Yarand D; Hart D; Hammond CJ; Spector TD
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2018 Apr; 21(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 29582724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A preliminary twin study in Taiwan. II. Dermatoglyphic aspect and zygosity-testing.
    Lin RS; Chiu FY; Chen KP
    Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1969 Apr; 68(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 5262671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twin method: defense of a critical assumption.
    Scarr S; Carter-Saltzman L
    Behav Genet; 1979 Nov; 9(6):527-42. PubMed ID: 263638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources of information for discriminating MZ and DZ twins by dermatoglyphic patterns.
    Reed T; Norton JA; Christian JC
    Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1977; 26(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 562054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosing zygosity in infant twins: physical similarity, genotyping, and chorionicity.
    Forget-Dubois N; Pérusse D; Turecki G; Girard A; Billette JM; Rouleau G; Boivin M; Malo J; Tremblay RE
    Twin Res; 2003 Dec; 6(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 14965457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of zygosity diagnosis in twin pairs below age seven by means of a mailed questionnaire.
    Bønnelykke B; Hauge M; Holm N; Kristoffersen K; Gurtler H
    Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1989; 38(3-4):305-13. PubMed ID: 2698574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.