These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6543581)

  • 1. Chromosome-aberration tests.
    Abbondandolo A
    Food Addit Contam; 1984; 1(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 6543581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The measurement of induced genetic change in mammalian germ cells.
    Adler ID; Pacchierotti F; Russo A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():335-75. PubMed ID: 22147580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA damage and repair tests for the detection of genotoxic agents.
    Williams GM
    Food Addit Contam; 1984; 1(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 6536528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cytogenetic evaluation for genotoxicity of bisphenol-A in bone marrow cells of Swiss albino mice.
    Naik P; Vijayalaxmi KK
    Mutat Res; 2009 May; 676(1-2):106-12. PubMed ID: 19393337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of in vivo/in vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis for identification of organ-specific carcinogens.
    Furihata C; Matsushima T
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 1987; 17(3):245-77. PubMed ID: 3556021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotoxicity of crotonaldehyde in the bone marrow and germ cells of laboratory mice.
    Jha AM; Singh AC; Sinha U; Kumar M
    Mutat Res; 2007 Aug; 632(1-2):69-77. PubMed ID: 17543575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studies for a genotoxic potential of some endogenous and exogenous sex steroids. II. Communication: examination for the induction of cytogenetic damage using the chromosomal aberration assay on human lymphocytes in vitro and the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test in vivo.
    Reimann R; Kalweit S; Lang R
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 28(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8844995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Characteristics of genotoxic and carcinogenic action of metals].
    Maksimchuk TP; Babenko GA
    Eksp Onkol; 1990; 12(4):3-9. PubMed ID: 2199186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test.
    Clare G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():69-91. PubMed ID: 22147569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of short-term tests in identifying potential germ cell mutagens: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA; Bridges BA; Adler ID
    Mutat Res; 1994 Dec; 341(2):109-31. PubMed ID: 7527489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interpretation and analysis of cytogenetic data.
    Danford N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():93-120. PubMed ID: 22147570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The monitoring of environmental mutagens/carcinogens. A perspective on tests predicting chemical mutagens/carcinogens in man.
    Anderson D
    Ecol Dis; 1982; 1(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 6765300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction for differences in germ cell stage sensitivity in risk assessment.
    Lee WR; Kelley MR
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1986; 208():99-102. PubMed ID: 3083428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A carcinogens--methods for detecting environmental muta/carcinogens].
    Morimoto K; Koizumi A
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1985 Apr; 12(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 3885860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies of glutaraldehyde--a review.
    Zeiger E; Gollapudi B; Spencer P
    Mutat Res; 2005 Mar; 589(2):136-51. PubMed ID: 15795166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.