These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6543865)

  • 1. Speech intelligibility of deaf speakers and distinctive feature usage.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jan; 24(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 6543865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinctive-feature analyses of the speech of deaf children.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 3842843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listener judges and the speech intelligibility of deaf children.
    Mencke EO; Ochsner GJ; Testut EW
    J Commun Disord; 1983 May; 16(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 6875033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of loud and amplified speech on sentence and word intelligibility in Parkinson disease.
    Neel AT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):1021-33. PubMed ID: 18978211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of segmental and suprasegmental corrections on the intelligibility of deaf speech.
    Maassen B; Povel DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):877-86. PubMed ID: 4031258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forced-choice analysis of segmental production by Chinese-accented English speakers.
    Rogers CL; Dalby J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 15989394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation.
    Allen MC; Nikolopoulos TP; O'Donoghue GM
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):742-6. PubMed ID: 9831147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and clinical relevance of segmental analysis based on intelligibility assessment.
    Van Nuffelen G; De Bodt M; Guns C; Wuyts F; Van de Heyning P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 18781075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dysarthric speech: a comparison of computerized speech recognition and listener intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Leeper HA; Kotler AL; Thomas-Stonell N; O'Neill C; Dylke MC; Rolls K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1997 Jul; 34(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 9239624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners.
    McGarr NS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 6645470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Listening to deaf speech: does experience count?
    Klimacka L; Patterson A; Patterson R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2001; 36 Suppl():210-5. PubMed ID: 11340784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utterance-based proposed spot diagnostic system of vocal tract malfunction.
    Fayed ZT
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():485-91. PubMed ID: 11347439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Production variability and single word intelligibility in aphasia and apraxia of speech.
    Haley KL; Martin G
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 20822776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.