These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6544840)
1. 40 Hz middle latency responses to low frequency tone pips in normally hearing adults. Szyfter W; Dauman R; de Sauvage RC J Otolaryngol; 1984 Oct; 13(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 6544840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip. Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Aoyagi M; Yamazaki Y; Yokota M; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Itoh S; Watanabe T Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():6-10. PubMed ID: 8740802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli. Wood MH; Seitz MR; Jacobson JT J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 528293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects. Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of hearing thresholds of 40Hz auditory event related potential and auditory brainstem response]. Fan L; SUN H; ZHU G; SHEN Y Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Nov; 16(4):193-5, S1. PubMed ID: 12536963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between middle latency responses and late auditory evoked potentials for approximating frequency-specific hearing levels in medicolegal patients with occupational hearing loss. Dejonckere PH; Coryn CP Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 14689639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Results of recording frequency-specific acoustically evoked potentials with masked stimuli]. Schönweiler R; Tolloczko R; Ptok M HNO; 1995 Jun; 43(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 7642399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants. Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity. Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Small SA; Stapells DR Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study. Wong WY; Stapells DR Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Correlation of auditory brainstem evoked potentials and pure tone audiometric thresholds]. Martínez Ibarguen A Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1993; 44(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 8357628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]