These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6544840)

  • 1. 40 Hz middle latency responses to low frequency tone pips in normally hearing adults.
    Szyfter W; Dauman R; de Sauvage RC
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Oct; 13(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 6544840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency specificity of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response.
    Aoyagi M; Yamazaki Y; Yokota M; Fuse T; Suzuki Y; Itoh S; Watanabe T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():6-10. PubMed ID: 8740802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli.
    Wood MH; Seitz MR; Jacobson JT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 528293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
    Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of hearing thresholds of 40Hz auditory event related potential and auditory brainstem response].
    Fan L; SUN H; ZHU G; SHEN Y
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Nov; 16(4):193-5, S1. PubMed ID: 12536963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between middle latency responses and late auditory evoked potentials for approximating frequency-specific hearing levels in medicolegal patients with occupational hearing loss.
    Dejonckere PH; Coryn CP
    Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 14689639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Results of recording frequency-specific acoustically evoked potentials with masked stimuli].
    Schönweiler R; Tolloczko R; Ptok M
    HNO; 1995 Jun; 43(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 7642399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity.
    Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Correlation of auditory brainstem evoked potentials and pure tone audiometric thresholds].
    Martínez Ibarguen A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1993; 44(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 8357628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Middle latency and 40 Hz auditory evoked responses in normal hearing children: 500 Hz thresholds.
    Barajas JJ; Fernández R; Bernal MR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():99-104. PubMed ID: 3227289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Steady-state response audiometry in a group of patients with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss.
    Ballay C; Tonini R; Waninger T; Yoon C; Manolidis S
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jul; 115(7):1243-6. PubMed ID: 15995514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Portions of tone pips contributing to frequency-selective auditory brain stem responses.
    Kodera K; Marsh RR; Suzuki M; Suzuki J
    Audiology; 1983; 22(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 6870663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study between auditory steady-state responses, auditory brain-stem responses and liminar tonal audiometry].
    Martínez Fernández A; Alañón Fernández MA; Ayala Martínez LF; Alvarez Alvarez AB; Miranda León MT; Sainz Quevedo M
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2007; 58(7):290-5. PubMed ID: 17683695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Correlation of subjective and objective methods of evaluating hearing threshold].
    Komazec Z; Milosević D; Filipović D
    Med Pregl; 2001; 54(7-8):332-7. PubMed ID: 11905181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Medium-latency acoustically evoked brain potentials used for examination of the auditory pathway (author's transl)].
    Gerull G; Giesen M; Knüpling R; Mrowinski D
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 7230998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.