These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6545538)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus level on vocal suppression in neonates.
    Riccillo SC; Topping GE; Watterson T
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 6545538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vocal suppression as a neonatal response to auditory stimuli.
    Watterson T; Riccillo SC
    J Aud Res; 1983 Jul; 23(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 6680722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of stimulus frequency on vocal suppression in neonates.
    Watterson T; Riccillo S
    J Aud Res; 1985 Apr; 25(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 3842140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of ambient acoustic noise on the auditory steady-state response thresholds in normally hearing adults.
    Kei J; Smith D; Joseph S; Stopa J; Kang S; Darnell R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17715465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of auditory stimuli in crying inhibition in the neonate.
    Hazlewood V
    J Aud Res; 1977 Oct; 17(4):225-40. PubMed ID: 368006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and tone-burst auditory brainstem responses in normal babies.
    Rance G; Tomlin D; Rickards FW
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):751-62. PubMed ID: 17086084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TEOAE amplitude growth, detectability, and response threshold in linear and nonlinear mode and in different time windows.
    Hoth S; Polzer M; Neumann K; Plinkert P
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):407-18. PubMed ID: 17654082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity.
    Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of noise on the vestibular system - Vestibular evoked potential studies in rats.
    Sohmer H; Elidan J; Plotnik M; Freeman S; Sockalingam R; Berkowitz Z; Mager M
    Noise Health; 1999; 2(5):41-52. PubMed ID: 12689484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-frequency Bekesy audiometry: III. Reliability and validity revisited.
    Gauz MT; Robinson DO; Peters GM
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):167-80. PubMed ID: 7185811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM(2)/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults.
    D'haenens W; Dhooge I; De Vel E; Maes L; Bockstael A; Vinck BM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):399-406. PubMed ID: 17654081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new hearing test applicable to the crying newborn infant.
    O'Doherty NJ
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol Beih; 1970; 13-14():106-9. PubMed ID: 5006276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the acoustic reflex threshold at 3 kc/s for setting optimal click-presentation level in ABR testing.
    Kasden SD
    J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 7349866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.