These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6547002)
21. Polluting Developing Brains - EPA Failure on Chlorpyrifos. Rauh VA N Engl J Med; 2018 Mar; 378(13):1171-1174. PubMed ID: 29590550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Current carcinogen perspectives: De minimis, Delaney and decisions. Weisburger EK Sci Total Environ; 1989 Oct; 86(1-2):5-13. PubMed ID: 2690341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does the Delaney Clause of the U.S. Food and Drug laws prevent human cancers? Weisburger JH Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1994 May; 22(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 8056196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. EPA, environmental release, and the regulatory process. Farnham P FASEB J; 1989 Apr; 3(6):1687-8. PubMed ID: 2703105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. EDB contamination kindles federal action. Sun M Science; 1984 Feb; 223(4635):464-6. PubMed ID: 6362008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Food safety and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Delaney Clause). AMA Council on Scientific Affairs. Conn Med; 1980 Mar; 44(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 7363620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A toxicologist's view of cancer risk assessment. Rozman KK; Kerecsen L; Viluksela MK; Osterle D; Deml E; Viluksela M; Stahl BU; Greim H; Doull J Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):29-52. PubMed ID: 8744588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Nuclear waste. EPA regulates at last. Beardsley T Nature; 1985 Aug 29-Sep 4; 316(6031):757. PubMed ID: 4033774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Delaney clause knocked out by surprise compromise act. Hoyle R Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Sep; 14(9):1056. PubMed ID: 9631048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cancer-causing substances in food, drugs, and cosmetics. The de minimis rule versus the Delaney clause. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1988 Nov; 319(19):1262-4. PubMed ID: 3273488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Delaney still the best protection. Lester SU Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Apr; 104(4):352. PubMed ID: 8732935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. New EPA administrator enters debate over pesticide residues in processed foods. Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Apr; 101(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 8513756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Genetic manipulation: agency tries out regulations. Beardsley T Nature; 1984 Oct 25-31; 311(5988):695. PubMed ID: 6593598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Editorial: Comments on the scientific basis for the "Delaney Clause". Saffiotti U Prev Med; 1973 Mar; 2(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 4803323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Food safety regulation: reforming the Delaney Clause. Merrill RA Annu Rev Public Health; 1997; 18():313-40. PubMed ID: 9143722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Editorial: The Delaney Clause. Coon JM Prev Med; 1973 Mar; 2(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 4378415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Report on cumulative dietary risk assessment of organophosphorus insecticides is flawed. Barraj LM; Petersen B; Tomerlin JR Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Aug; 28(1):67-8. PubMed ID: 9784435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. To eat or not to eat? Food safety in the United States. Galson SK J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Jul; 109(7):1142. PubMed ID: 19559125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]