These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6547735)

  • 1. An acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 6547735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Tong YC; Brown AM; Luscombe SM; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 6547734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users.
    Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
    Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
    Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 May; 51(5):389-98. PubMed ID: 22201528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant: Is there a need for adjustment of the default frequency allocation tables?
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; Grolman W; van Zanten GA
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():124-133. PubMed ID: 27789255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.
    Marimuthu V; Swanson BA; Mannell R
    Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27094028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant.
    Macherey O; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):339-49. PubMed ID: 20058981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.
    Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1282-97. PubMed ID: 25786942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some aspects of temporal coding for single-channel electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Dobie RA; Dillier N
    Hear Res; 1985 Apr; 18(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 3839786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Tong YC; Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 6688434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ipsilateral acoustic electric pitch matching: a case study of cochlear implantation in an up-sloping hearing loss with preserved hearing across multiple frequencies.
    Prentiss S; Staecker H; Wolford B
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 24601768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
    McKay CM; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.