These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6548058)

  • 1. Modeling acoustic attenuation of soft tissue with a minimum-phase filter.
    Kuc R
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Jan; 6(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 6548058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of the low-complexity Hilbert FIR filter enhanced 112-Gbit/s SSB 16-QAM transmission with parallelized Kramers-Kronig reception over 1440-km SSMF.
    Liu Y; Li Y; Song J; Luo M; He Z; Yang C; Lv J; Qiu J; Hong X; Guo H; Wu J
    Opt Express; 2021 Nov; 29(23):38796-38810. PubMed ID: 34808924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-speed spectral calibration by complex FIR filter in phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography.
    Kim S; Raphael PD; Oghalai JS; Applegate BE
    Biomed Opt Express; 2016 Apr; 7(4):1430-44. PubMed ID: 27446666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and application of finite impulse response digital filters.
    Miller TR; Sampathkumaran KS
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1982; 7(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 7060600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time hand-held ultrasound medical-imaging device based on a new digital quadrature demodulation processor.
    Levesque P; Sawan M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Aug; 56(8):1654-65. PubMed ID: 19686981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New demodulation filter in digital phase rotation beamforming.
    Schneider FK; Yoo YM; Agarwal A; Koh LM; Kim Y
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Jul; 44(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 16563453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parameter estimation for nonlinear frequency dependent attenuation in soft tissue.
    He P; McGoron A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(8):757-63. PubMed ID: 2694562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of Unknown Linear Systems Deduced from Measured CW Magnitude.
    Ma MT; Adams JW
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 1993; 98(3):297-319. PubMed ID: 28053476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and applications of an interactive digital filter design program.
    Woo HW; Kim YM; Tompkins WJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1985 Oct; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 3852710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel approach for optimal design of digital FIR filter using grasshopper optimization algorithm.
    Yadav S; Yadav R; Kumar A; Kumar M
    ISA Trans; 2021 Feb; 108():196-206. PubMed ID: 32917373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid method for designing digital FIR filters based on fractional derivative constraints.
    Baderia K; Kumar A; Kumar Singh G
    ISA Trans; 2015 Sep; 58():493-508. PubMed ID: 26142984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forward propagation of time evolving acoustic pressure: formulation and investigation of the impulse response in time-wavenumber domain.
    Grulier V; Paillasseur S; Thomas JH; Pascal JC; Le Roux JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2367-78. PubMed ID: 19894820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of finite impulse response filters to the detection of fetal electrocardiogram signals.
    Phoenix RG; Crowe JA; Gibson NM; Peasgood W; Woolfson MS; Faulkner TR
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(2):89-103. PubMed ID: 8107669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applications of least-squares FIR filters to virtual acoustic space.
    Chen J; Wu Z; Reale RA
    Hear Res; 1994 Nov; 80(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 7896574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling and computer simulation of ultrasound imaging systems and human tissues.
    Lee BS; Park SB
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Oct; 10(4):229-47. PubMed ID: 3074548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase correction of interferograms using digital all-pass filters.
    Furstenberg R; White JO
    Appl Spectrosc; 2005 Mar; 59(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 15901312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel configuration of finite-impulse-response filters tolerant to carrier-phase fluctuations in digital coherent optical receivers for higher-order quadrature amplitude modulation signals.
    Mori Y; Zhang C; Kikuchi K
    Opt Express; 2012 Nov; 20(24):26236-51. PubMed ID: 23187478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalization of the linear matched filter concept to nonlinear matched filters.
    Javidi B
    Appl Opt; 1990 Mar; 29(8):1215-24. PubMed ID: 20562981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of the filter phase in phase sampling interferometry.
    Quiroga JA; Servín M; Estrada JC; Vargas J; Torre-Belizon FJ
    Opt Express; 2011 Oct; 19(21):19987-92. PubMed ID: 21997008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite impulse response utilizing the principle of superposition.
    Carter SE; Malocha DC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1997; 44(2):386-98. PubMed ID: 18244136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.