These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6548514)

  • 21. Lower-limb proprioception in above-knee amputees.
    Eakin CL; Quesada PM; Skinner H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Nov; (284):239-46. PubMed ID: 1395300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Functional gait analysis of trans-femoral amputees using two different single-axis prosthetic knees with hydraulic swing-phase control: Kinematic and kinetic comparison of two prosthetic knees.
    Sapin E; Goujon H; de Almeida F; Fodé P; Lavaste F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Jun; 32(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 18569888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in whole-body angular momentum between below-knee amputees and non-amputees across walking speeds.
    Silverman AK; Neptune RR
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 21074161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of two-dimensional induced accelerations from measured kinematic and kinetic data.
    Hof AL; Otten E
    Gait Posture; 2005 Nov; 22(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 16214657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.
    Vrieling AH; van Keeken HG; Schoppen T; Otten E; Halbertsma JP; Hof AL; Postema K
    Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 18242995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot.
    Schneider K; Hart T; Zernicke RF; Setoguchi Y; Oppenheim W
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1191-204. PubMed ID: 8253824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting lower limb joint kinematics using wearable motion sensors.
    Findlow A; Goulermas JY; Nester C; Howard D; Kenney LP
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jul; 28(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 18093834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of frontal plane trunk kinematics and hip and knee moments during anticipated and unanticipated walking and side step cutting tasks.
    Houck JR; Duncan A; De Haven KE
    Gait Posture; 2006 Nov; 24(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 16293416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Compensatory mechanism involving the knee joint of the intact limb during gait in unilateral below-knee amputees.
    Beyaert C; Grumillier C; Martinet N; Paysant J; André JM
    Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 18295487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender differences exist in the hip joint moments of healthy older walkers.
    Boyer KA; Beaupre GS; Andriacchi TP
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3360-5. PubMed ID: 19022448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A method to measure the accuracy of loads in knee-ankle-foot orthoses using conventional gait analysis, applied to persons with poliomyelitis.
    Andrysek J; Redekop S; Matsui NC; Kooy J; Hubbard S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jul; 89(7):1372-9. PubMed ID: 18586141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speed-dependent variations of lower-limb joint angles during walking. A graphic computerized method showing individual patterns.
    Frigo C; Tesio L
    Am J Phys Med; 1986 Apr; 65(2):51-62. PubMed ID: 3963165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forces and moments on the human leg in the frontal plane during static bipedal stance.
    Carmines DV; MacMahon EB
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):917-25. PubMed ID: 1403307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methodology for determining the sensitivity of swing leg toe clearance and leg length to swing leg joint angles during gait.
    Moosabhoy MA; Gard SA
    Gait Posture; 2006 Dec; 24(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 16439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Load moments about the hip and knee joints during ergometer cycling.
    Ericson MO; Bratt A; Nisell R; Németh G; Ekholm J
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1986; 18(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 3810083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of the 3D inverse dynamic method on the joint forces and moments during gait.
    Dumas R; Nicol E; Chèze L
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Oct; 129(5):786-90. PubMed ID: 17887905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Joint contact forces can be reduced by improving joint moment symmetry in below-knee amputee gait simulations.
    Koelewijn AD; van den Bogert AJ
    Gait Posture; 2016 Sep; 49():219-225. PubMed ID: 27459416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Forces and turning moments of hip and knee joints in locomotion].
    Baumann JU; Schär A; Meier G
    Orthopade; 1992 Feb; 21(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 1549334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Dynamic loads at knee joint of trans-tibial amputee on different terrains].
    Jia X; Zhang M; Fan Y; Wang R
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 22(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 15884522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Explaining the hip adduction moment variability during gait: Implications for hip abductor strengthening.
    Rutherford DJ; Hubley-Kozey C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19136181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.