These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6549289)
1. The prognosis of glaucoma investigated with computerized perimetry. de Natale R; Glaab-Schrems E; Krieglstein GK Doc Ophthalmol; 1984 Dec; 58(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 6549289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)]. Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects. Heijl A; Drance SM; Douglas GR Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Sep; 98(9):1560-3. PubMed ID: 7425915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma. Hong C; Kitazawa Y; Shirato S Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7068332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects. Heijl A; Drance SM Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 May; 99(5):832-6. PubMed ID: 7236085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Trope GE; Britton R Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. JO and STATJO: programs for investigating the visual field with the Octopus automatic perimeter. Flammer J; Drance SM; Jenni A; Bebie H Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 18(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 6688197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Peritest automatic perimeter in screening for glaucomatous visual field defects. Douglas GR Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 18(7):318-20. PubMed ID: 6671150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Bayer AU; Erb C Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [What new knowledge has automated perimetry with the Octopus brought on glaucomatous visual field changes?]. Gloor B; Stürmer J; Vökt B Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Apr; 184(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 6727246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)]. Krieglstein GK; Glaab E; Gramer E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Statistical analysis of visual fields by the automatic perimeter Octopus 2000 R with the Delta program]. Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(8-9):541-8. PubMed ID: 3841358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression. Wall M; Johnson CA; Zamba KD Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term studies of visual field changes by means of computerized perimetry (Octopus 201) in eyes with glaucomatous field defects after normalization of the intra-ocular pressure. Leydhecker W; Gramer E Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):113-7. PubMed ID: 2744939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Study of early glaucomatous visual field defects with the automatic perimeter Topcon SBP-1000. Comparative study with the Octopus 201 perimeter]. Lachenmayr B Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 191(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3657015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The short-term effect of laser trabeculoplasty on the glaucomatous visual field. A prospective study using computerized perimetry. Heijl A; Bengtsson B Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1984 Oct; 62(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 6507060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry. Bevers C; Blanckaert G; Van Keer K; Fils JF; Vandewalle E; Stalmans I Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e499-e505. PubMed ID: 30345638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. Flammer J; Drance SM; Augustiny L; Funkhouser A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Feb; 26(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 3972500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma. Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]