These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6549516)

  • 1. Automated static perimetry to evaluate diabetic retinopathy.
    Federman JL; Lloyd J
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1984; 82():358-70. PubMed ID: 6549516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retinal sensitivity loss and structural disturbance in areas of capillary nonperfusion of eyes with diabetic retinopathy.
    Unoki N; Nishijima K; Sakamoto A; Kita M; Watanabe D; Hangai M; Kimura T; Kawagoe N; Ohta M; Yoshimura N
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 17868632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
    Bengtsson B; Hellgren KJ; Agardh E
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Study of the visual field using automated static perimetry following panretinal photocoagulation in the diabetic].
    Zaluski S; Marcil G; Lamer L; Lambert J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1986; 9(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 3805588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Automated flicker perimetry].
    Lachenmayr B; Gleissner M; Rothbächer H
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 2625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central visual field changes using flicker perimetry in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Stavrou EP; Wood JM
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Oct; 83(5):574-80. PubMed ID: 16187995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
    Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated perimetric changes following panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy.
    Khosla PK; Gupta V; Tewari HK; Kumar A
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1993 Apr; 24(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 8321507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
    Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and capillary density in early diabetic maculopathy.
    Remky A; Arend O; Hendricks S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jan; 41(1):274-81. PubMed ID: 10634631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Computer-assisted quantitative-static perimetry following panretinal argon laser coagulation in diabetic retinopathy].
    Becker H; Schmitz J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Mar; 192(3):204-7. PubMed ID: 3374010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The significance of examining macular sensitivity using Friedmann's static perimetry in diabetes with early angiopathy].
    Tomović J; Litricin V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1981 Mar; 109(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 7345594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Application of automated perimetry in diagnosis of macular diseases].
    Sobolewski P; Słomska J; Pieńkowska-Machoy E; Janecki J; Sabasiński K
    Klin Oczna; 1999; 101(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 10581891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic static threshold perimetry is useful for estimating the effects of laser photocoagulation on diabetic maculopathy.
    Okuyama M; Okisaka S
    Ophthalmic Res; 1998; 30(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 9667051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Realini T; Lai MQ; Barber L
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.