These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6551143)

  • 1. The legal side. "Do not feed...".
    Cushing M
    Am J Nurs; 1983 Apr; 83(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 6551143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment?
    Smith GP
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.
    Britton JR
    West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Putting hospitals on notice.
    Fost N
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Aug; 12(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 6215343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis.
    Rosenblum VG; Grant ER
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
    Shapiro RS
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective treatment decisions and the legal rights of very young infants.
    Petersen KA
    Med J Aust; 1994 Mar; 160(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 8133824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baby Doe's legacy.
    Carroll JB; Andrusko D
    America (NY); 1985 Jun; 152(21):450-3. PubMed ID: 11658654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 'Government directive on infant euthanasia is ambiguous.
    Klug J
    Ob Gyn News; 1982 Aug 15-31; 17(16):11. PubMed ID: 11653462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HHS rushes rule to prevent infant mercy killings.
    Med World News; 1983 Mar; 24(6):43-4. PubMed ID: 11645503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns.
    Lynch JJ
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Feb; 15(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 2495502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critically ill newborns and the law. The American experience.
    Merrick JC
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 7636402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birth-defective infants: a standard for nontreatment decisions.
    MacMillan ES
    Stanford Law Rev; 1978 Feb; 30(3):599-633. PubMed ID: 10306127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment for seriously ill newborns.
    Strain JE
    Pediatrics; 1983 Oct; 72(4):572-3. PubMed ID: 6889074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict.
    Berseth CL
    Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Govt. rules on withholding impaired infants' care.
    Miller RH
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Apr 15-30; 18(8):20. PubMed ID: 11653474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ordinary care.
    America (NY); 1983 Apr; 148(17):330. PubMed ID: 11658412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.