These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
14. Professional indemnity and other medico-legal matters: a midwifery concern? Mair J Aust Coll Midwives Inc J; 1995 Jun; 8(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 7575191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Malpractice insurance: can nurse-midwifery meet the challenge? Lehrman EJ Ariz Nurse; 1985; 38(5):6. PubMed ID: 3851659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The medical malpractice insurance crisis. An overview of the issues. Kendellen R J Nurse Midwifery; 1987; 32(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 3644882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The myth of vicarious liability. Impact on barriers to nurse-midwifery practice. Jenkins SM J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 8027852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Court case of nursing malpractice--midwife's failure to monitor on the machine the fetal heart beat which caused cerebral palsy of the newborn]. Fukaya Y Kango; 1995 Jul; 47(9):147-53. PubMed ID: 8716731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The risk of nurse-midwives assessing patients by phone. Case on point: Ali v. Community Health Care Plan, Inc., 801 A.2d. 775-CT (2002). Tammelleo AD Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Aug; 43(3):2. PubMed ID: 12224350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nurse-midwives in malpractice crisis. Regan E N M Nurse; 1985; 30(4):8. PubMed ID: 3868760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]