These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 655253)

  • 1. Ball-bearing keratometry.
    Schechter RJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1978 May; 85(5 Pt 1):715. PubMed ID: 655253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls.
    Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 107(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 2757555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the EH-270 corneal topographer with conventional keratometry.
    Davis LJ; Dresner MS
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 1893543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hand-held keratometer.
    Lam AK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 May; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7659423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of automated and conventional keratometers.
    Nakada S; Tanaka M; Nakajima A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1984 Jun; 97(6):776-8. PubMed ID: 6731543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea.
    Olsen T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1986 Feb; 70(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 3947615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attachment for the Bausch & Lomb keratometer in pediatrics.
    Szirth BC; Matsumoto E; Wright K; Murphree AL
    J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1988; 7(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 3336052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer.
    Dehnavi Z; Khabazkhoob M; Mirzajani A; Jabbarvand M; Yekta A; Jafarzadehpur E
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2015; 22(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 25949084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modification, calibration, and comparative testing of an automated surgical keratometer.
    Simon G; Parel JM; Nose I; Lee W
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 2043560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Keratometry obtained by corneal mapping versus the IOLMaster in the prediction of postoperative refraction in routine cataract surgery.
    Dulku S; Smith HB; Antcliff RJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013; 41(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 22594695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keratometry and refractometry in the IOL patient.
    Rengel A; Horan C
    J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 1984; 3(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 6559210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of posture and artificial tears on corneal power measurements with a handheld automated keratometer.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 15050262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
    Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keratometry - A technique that should be relegated to the clinical dark ages?
    Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Dec; 40(6):357-359. PubMed ID: 29050662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of corneal curvature after corneal transplantation and radial keratotomy using standard and automated keratometry.
    Binder PS
    CLAO J; 1989; 15(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 2673574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal power.
    Whang WJ; Byun YS; Joo CK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 40(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 22394318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of general anesthesia and muscle relaxants on keratometry measurements using a handheld keratometer.
    Al-Haddad C; Jurdy L; Farhat A; Farah F; Aouad M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 25036105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical assessment of a hand-held automated keratometer in cataract surgery.
    Leyland M; Benjamin L
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():854-7. PubMed ID: 9537145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal densitometry and its correlation with age, pachymetry, corneal curvature, and refraction.
    Garzón N; Poyales F; Illarramendi I; Mendicute J; Jáñez Ó; Caro P; López A; Argüeso F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 37(6):1263-1268. PubMed ID: 27837355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diurnal fluctuations in human refraction].
    Krause K; Taege A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Jan; 192(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 3352188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.