These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 655253)
41. [Principle and kinds of ophthalmometer]. Yamaji R Kaiin Dayori Nihon Kontakuto Renzu Gakkai; 1965; 7(7):66-80. PubMed ID: 5894879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study. Olsen T; Arnarsson A; Sasaki H; Sasaki K; Jonasson F Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 17286626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The steel ball-bearing test: a new test for evaluating protective sensation in the diabetic foot. Papanas N; Gries A; Maltezos E; Zick R Diabetologia; 2006 Apr; 49(4):739-43. PubMed ID: 16425034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Method of extending the range of the keratometer. Miller D; Holmberg A; Exford J; Boyd M Am J Ophthalmol; 1969 Nov; 68(5):931-3. PubMed ID: 5352610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Curvature of the cornea and total refraction of the myopic eye]. Zolog N; Rujescu C Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Oftalmol; 1978; 22(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 749033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Value of qualitative keratometry for the correction of postoperative astigmatism]. Metge P; Morin B; Cohen H; Graff F; Serret JC Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1989; 89(6-7):881-4. PubMed ID: 2605760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Modifying influence of the size of the eye-ball in glaucomas (author's transl)]. Leighton DA Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1974 Apr; 164(4):475-8. PubMed ID: 4843832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Difference of Japanese and American personnel in relationship between frontal corneal radius of curvature and subjective refractive power]. AKIYAMA K Rinsho Ganka; 1962 Feb; 16():207-11. PubMed ID: 13859951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of corneal refraction in a model of a gaze tracking system. Villanueva A; Cabeza R IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Dec; 55(12):2812-22. PubMed ID: 19126462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Accuracy and reproducibility of Nidek's photokeratoanalyser]. Riss I; Hostyn P; Kuhne F; Dupuy B; Le Rebeller MJ J Fr Ophtalmol; 1991; 14(8-9):451-4. PubMed ID: 1779115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies. Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22999600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [A research on clinical values of corneal topography and keratometer in measuring astigmatism]. Zhang K; Li Z; Lu W Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Nov; 34(6):448-50. PubMed ID: 11877251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes. Uçakhan OO; Sternberg G; Bodian C; Kelliher K; Asbell PA CLAO J; 2000 Jul; 26(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 10946987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Validation of Orbscan II posterior corneal curvature measurement for intraocular lens power calculation. Leyland M Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 15069429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Factors influencing central corneal thickness in a Turkish population. Altinok A; Sen E; Yazici A; Aksakal FN; Oncul H; Koklu G Curr Eye Res; 2007 May; 32(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 17514526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Determining the zone of reflection for posterior corneal surface comparison phakometry. Carkeet A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 19154286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Accuracy and reproducibility of the Eyesys corneal topographic analysis system]. Fourmaux E; Riss I; Dupuy B; Le Rebeller MJ J Fr Ophtalmol; 1994; 17(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 8089421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of the Pentacam equivalent keratometry reading and IOL Master keratometry measurement in intraocular lens power calculations. Karunaratne N Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 41(9):825-34. PubMed ID: 23601493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]