These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 655253)

  • 61. The development of the refractive status and ocular growth in C57BL/6 mice.
    Zhou X; Shen M; Xie J; Wang J; Jiang L; Pan M; Qu J; Lu F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 49(12):5208-14. PubMed ID: 18689702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery in the absence of clinical history.
    Bialer OY; Kaiserman I; Bahar I
    Ophthalmic Res; 2014; 52(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 25402842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Clinical characterization of spherical post-lens debris associated with lotrafilcon high-Dk silicone lenses.
    Dumbleton K; Jones L; Chalmers R; Williams-Lyn D; Fonn D
    CLAO J; 2000 Oct; 26(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 11071342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Corneal topography in contact lens wearers following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Sperber LT; Lopatynsky MO; Cohen EJ
    CLAO J; 1995 Jul; 21(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7586477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Computer-assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility of the topographic modeling system.
    Legeais JM; Ren Q; Simon G; Parel JM
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 8241039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Reliability of keratometer readings--addendum.
    Brungardt TF
    Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1973 Sep; 50(9):736-8. PubMed ID: 4518537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A pocket refracto.
    Cohen SW
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1968 Nov; 66(5):958-60. PubMed ID: 5686932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comments on: Using Brückner's test for gross keratometry screening.
    Kothari M; Jahan S; Solanki M
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 68(1):262. PubMed ID: 31856549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Response to comments on: Using Brückner's test for gross keratometry screening.
    Bhayana AA
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 68(1):263. PubMed ID: 31856550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls.
    Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 107(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 2757555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A comparison of the EH-270 corneal topographer with conventional keratometry.
    Davis LJ; Dresner MS
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 1893543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A hand-held keratometer.
    Lam AK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 May; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7659423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Comparison of automated and conventional keratometers.
    Nakada S; Tanaka M; Nakajima A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1984 Jun; 97(6):776-8. PubMed ID: 6731543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Ball-bearing keratometry.
    Schechter RJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1978 May; 85(5 Pt 1):715. PubMed ID: 655253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 4.