These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6552901)

  • 1. Discipline without punishment.
    Harvey EL; Middaugh SE
    AORN J; 1983 Apr; 37(5):914-7, 920-2, 924. PubMed ID: 6552901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluating performance to guarantee a high standard].
    Pins JA; Hardie CG
    Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3438684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing a performance appraisal tool. Part 5.
    Fernsebner B
    OR Manager; 1991 Dec; 7(12):14-5. PubMed ID: 10115714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring quality: evaluating personnel competencies.
    Macdonald A
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1996; 14(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8715692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planning is key to performance management. Part I.
    Fernsebner B
    OR Manager; 1991 Aug; 7(8):19-20. PubMed ID: 10113047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OR RN competence holds up, but new nurses' does not.
    OR Manager; 2002 Jul; 18(7):12-3. PubMed ID: 12134455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to write OR process standards. Using the Marker Model.
    OR Manager; 1987 Nov; 3(11):8-10. PubMed ID: 10284704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do you know you have a competent staff?
    OR Manager; 1998 Feb; 14(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 10179172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responsibility for audit criteria.
    Schmidt A; Deets C
    AORN J; 1978 Mar; 27(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 245976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can appraisal systems work?
    Beveridge WE
    Nurs Focus; 1979 Sep; 1(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 257227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing laser competencies. A process to ensure safe practice.
    Buszta C; Sovero BS
    AORN J; 1994 Feb; 59(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 8147593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance appraisal: an overview.
    Slesnick D; Kohler J
    Fla Nurse; 1982 Apr; 30(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 6918334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using performance standards for employee development.
    Pickering PH
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Jan; 13(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 10245138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposed standards of perioperative nursing. Clinical practice/professional performance.
    AORN J; 1991 Oct; 54(4):809, 812-8. PubMed ID: 1952904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance evaluation: when all is said and done, more is said than done.
    del Bueno DJ
    J Nurs Adm; 1977 Dec; 7(10):21-3. PubMed ID: 243524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Banding issues.
    J Perioper Pract; 2006 Feb; 16(2):62. PubMed ID: 16502734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SD and PR. The appraisal interview: six common situations.
    Stewart AM
    Nurs Times; 1978 Apr; 74(16):657-8. PubMed ID: 652531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Criterion Referenced Performance Appraisal System can add to the effectiveness of the hospital and...improve quality of care.
    Berger L; Clipp FP
    South Hosp; 1982; 50(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 10256842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SD and PR. The problems of measuring performance.
    Stewart AM
    Nurs Times; 1978 Apr; 74(16):659-61. PubMed ID: 652532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grading revisited.
    J Perioper Pract; 2006 Apr; 16(4):160. PubMed ID: 16669357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.