These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6553915)

  • 1. [Effect of evaluation on the worker].
    Ksykiewicz-Dorota A
    Pieleg Polozna; 1983; (2-3):11-2. PubMed ID: 6553915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are you going stale?
    Wilkinson R
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Jul; 18(7):74-5. PubMed ID: 3648602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The manager's challenge.
    Alexander GR
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 2640600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding, evaluating and improving nursing productivity.
    Williamson WJ; Johnston J
    Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):49-50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 3368148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluations.
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):vii-xvi, 1-160. PubMed ID: 2640597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluating performance to guarantee a high standard].
    Pins JA; Hardie CG
    Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3438684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychological preparedness.
    Christensen PB; Cogdell CH
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):7-18. PubMed ID: 2640604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participative employee evaluation.
    Breeden SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. C-R-A-Mming for good nursing supervision Comprehensive Random Achievement Monitor.
    Price SL
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Aug; 19(8):80A-80B, 80F, 80H. PubMed ID: 3399218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personnel decisions: "wheeling" toward better performance.
    Casebeer L
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Aug; 21(8):42-4. PubMed ID: 2381600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of charge nurses].
    Nowomińska A
    Pieleg Polozna; 1984; 9():9-10, 33. PubMed ID: 6570258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating personnel with automated management systems.
    Brady M
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Jul; 19(7):38-9. PubMed ID: 3386954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Essentials of management. Communicating the basics.
    Scammell B
    Nurs Times; 1990 Mar 28-Apr 3; 86(13):34-7. PubMed ID: 2320449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing the performance appraisal system.
    Pelle D; Greenhalgh L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):37-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 3696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
    Beck S
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activity contracting.
    Anderson M
    Superv Nurse; 1979 Nov; 10(11):55-9. PubMed ID: 260323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.