BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6554709)

  • 21. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
    Fosbinder D; Vos H
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Staff appraisal. Means of assessment.
    Fletcher C
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 3-9; 81(27):24-6. PubMed ID: 3848833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Criterion referenced performance appraisal system: a blueprint.
    Sudela KD; Landureth L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Mar; 18(3):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 3645448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance appraisal systems in health care administration.
    Wiatrowski MD; Palkon DS
    Health Care Manage Rev; 1987; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 3557974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Progressive discipline in nursing. Arbitrators' decisions.
    Kjervik DK
    J Nurs Adm; 1984 Apr; 14(4):34-7. PubMed ID: 6561247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Activity contracting.
    Anderson M
    Superv Nurse; 1979 Nov; 10(11):55-9. PubMed ID: 260323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guidelines for introducing change.
    New JR; Couillard NA
    J Nurs Adm; 1981 Mar; 11(3):17-21. PubMed ID: 6924945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time documentation of clinical nurse specialist activities.
    Robichaud AM; Hamric AB
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Jan; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3632805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Developing performance appraisal tool for staff nurses.
    Arora T
    Nurs J India; 2009 Feb; 100(2):32-4. PubMed ID: 19588657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Staff performance evaluation: What? Why? How?
    Miller M
    J Emerg Nurs; 1984; 10(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 6368936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How can nurse managers make use of staff?
    Bell R
    Nurs Success Today; 1985 Apr; 2(4):15-7. PubMed ID: 3846778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
    Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Professional development. In praise of appraisal.
    Eggert M
    Nurs Times; 1993 Mar 3-9; 89(9):28-30. PubMed ID: 8456003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Managing by behavior and results--linking supervisory accountability to effective organizational control.
    Johnson J; Luciano K
    J Nurs Adm; 1983 Dec; 13(12):19-28. PubMed ID: 6557132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Staff appraisal. Starting from scratch.
    Dimmock S
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 24-30; 81(30):54-5. PubMed ID: 3848887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Seminar on nursing administration: personnel rating].
    Kong SK
    Taehan Kanho; 1984 Dec; 23(5):28-39. PubMed ID: 6569267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.