BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6554829)

  • 1. Fetal assessment.
    Franz WB
    Prim Care; 1983 Jun; 10(2):173-203. PubMed ID: 6554829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fetal movement patterns in the external cardiotocography and their interpretation by simultaneous ultrasound observation].
    Prenzlau P; Bayer H; Hoffmann H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1983; 105(15):972-6. PubMed ID: 6624300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the high risk fetus.
    Hobel CJ
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug; 6(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 498687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of sonography in the evaluation of the high-risk pregnancy.
    Manning FA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 28(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 2404302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Fetal movements].
    Neldam S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1980 Mar; 142(10):623-6. PubMed ID: 7368326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Fox A
    Lamp; 1980 Nov; 37(11):15-23. PubMed ID: 6904752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Significance of periods of fetal hyperactivity and hypoactivity at the end of pregnancy as demonstrated by tococinon. New series].
    Lempereur M; Schaal JP; Nirhy-Lanto AR; Colette C
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Jun; 82(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 3616381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suspect diagnoses come with biophysical profiling.
    Lemay G
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (69):56-7. PubMed ID: 15124328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal heart rate monitoring (continued from November Issue).
    Fox A
    Lamp; 1980 Dec; 37(12):43-54 contd. PubMed ID: 6906554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic monitoring of the fetus.
    Neuman MR
    Clin Perinatol; 1983 Feb; 10(1):237-52. PubMed ID: 6851391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal movement monitoring in normal and high-risk pregnancy.
    Ehrström C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1979; 80():1-32. PubMed ID: 283683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Perinatal risk assessment in diabetes].
    Shor Pinsker V; Correa Avalos C; López García R; Karchher S
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1981 Jan; 48(291):59-76. PubMed ID: 7024050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonstress antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Paul RH; Keegan KA
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug; 6(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 498685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Limitations of the cardiotocograph/fetal status relationship in pregnancy and labor].
    Destro F; Cubesi G; Capozzi A; Zisa F; Varagnolo C; Ceccarello PL; Bulzomi R; Perini G; Castello C; Fazzino A; Calcagnile F; De Fina G; Prestia M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1979 Mar; 31(3):97-114. PubMed ID: 530458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis and antepartum management of intrauterine growth retardation.
    Hobbins JC; Berkowitz RL; Grannum PA
    J Reprod Med; 1978 Nov; 21(5):319-5. PubMed ID: 731625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of fetal EEG as auxiliary technic of fetal monitoring in association with pH values and cardiotocographic signs].
    Galli PA
    Riv Ital Ginecol; 1976; 56(5-6):355-61. PubMed ID: 14391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The role of non-stress cardiotocography in the evaluation of fetal health].
    Török M; Egyed J; Csákány MG; Gáti I
    Orv Hetil; 1982 Jul; 123(30):1849-52. PubMed ID: 7133681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cardiotocography].
    Thoumsin HJ
    Rev Med Liege; 1979 Nov; 34(21):900-7. PubMed ID: 545623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antepartal cardiotocography in the assessment of fetal outcome.
    Käär K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1980; 94():1-56. PubMed ID: 6935909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.