These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6557311)

  • 1. Section 504, handicapped newborns, and ethics committees: an alternative to the hotline.
    Doudera AE
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):200-2, 236. PubMed ID: 6557311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infant care review committee and ethical decision making.
    Smith ED
    Nurs Adm Q; 1986; 10(3):44-50. PubMed ID: 3634948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Baby Doe regulations: governmental intervention in neonatal rescue medicine.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Jun; 74(6):618-20. PubMed ID: 6232863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns.
    Brooks BF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Baby Doe regulations: another view of change.
    Weil WB
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 3700073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of critically ill newborns.
    Pediatrics; 1983 Oct; 72(4):565-6. PubMed ID: 6889071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baby Doe committees: a critical evaluation.
    Mahowald MB
    Clin Perinatol; 1988 Dec; 15(4):789-800. PubMed ID: 3208479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
    Gostin L
    Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethics committees for infants doe?
    Fleischman AR; Murray TH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):5-9. PubMed ID: 6228539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withholding treatment from severely handicapped newborns: ethical-legal issues.
    Martin D
    Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(4):47-56. PubMed ID: 3848714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment for seriously ill newborns.
    Strain JE
    Pediatrics; 1983 Oct; 72(4):572-3. PubMed ID: 6889074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
    Jackson CC
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The initiation or withdrawal of treatment for high-risk newborns. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn.
    Pediatrics; 1995 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):362-3. PubMed ID: 7630702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pediatric ethics committees: ethical advisers or legal watchdogs?
    Weir RF
    Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 3695579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State legislation and the handicapped newborn: a moral and political dilemma.
    Feldman E; Murray TH
    Law Med Health Care; 1984 Sep; 12(4):156-63. PubMed ID: 6565916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do the right thing: Samuel Linares and defensive law.
    Fost N
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 2628647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns.
    Lynch JJ
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Feb; 15(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 2495502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infant care review committees. The response to federal guidelines.
    Fleming GV; Hudd SS; LeBailly SA; Greenstein RM
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Jul; 144(7):778-81. PubMed ID: 2356797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.