These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6557594)

  • 1. Nurses as patient advocates: legal aspects. Case in point: Witt, R.N. v. Forest Hospital et al (450 N.E. 2d 811 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Nov; 24(6):2. PubMed ID: 6557594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polygraph tests for nurses ordered. Case in point: Marsh v. Lake Forest Hospital (519 N.E. 2d 504 (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):2. PubMed ID: 3368575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Employee handbooks: your legal rights. Case in point: Duldulao v. St. Mary of Nazareth Hosp. (505 N.E. 2d 314-IL).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 May; 27(12):2. PubMed ID: 3648826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are you held to the standard of a nurse specialist? Case in point: Northern Trust Co. v. Louis A. Weiss Mem. Hosp. (493 N.E. 2d 5 - IL).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):2. PubMed ID: 3638741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mental patients and forced-medication. Case in point: Rogers et al v. Okin, M.D. et al (634 F 2d 650 - MASS.).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1981 Mar; 21(10):4. PubMed ID: 6908094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Discussion on the mental health law--proposed amendment of the law to promote patients' independence. Current situation in psychiatric hospitals and role of nursing personnel].
    Tanaka K
    Kango; 1986 Dec; 38(14):14-20. PubMed ID: 3649454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal case briefs for nurses. MI: epileptic pt. drowns: nurses terminated. IL: R.N.'s, M.D.'s & limitations: double standard.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 May; 25(12):3. PubMed ID: 3847084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When nurse "blows the whistle": termination. Case in point: Watassek v. Mich. Dept. of Mental Health (372 N.W.2d 617--MI).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Nov; 26(6):2. PubMed ID: 3852353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RNs face risks as patient advocates.
    Kraemer TM
    Oreg Nurse; 1993 Sep; 58(3):9. PubMed ID: 8414445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal issues. Part 1. Nursing advocacy of patients' rights: myth or reality?
    Nurse Pract; 1983 Mar; 8(3):53-5, 58-9. PubMed ID: 6843919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurse & the law. Patient autonomy vs paternalism.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1987 Sep; 17(3):54-6. PubMed ID: 3689231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. E.R. nurse fails to alert Dr.: lupus patient dies. Case in point: Major v. North Valley Hospital (759 P. 2d 153--MT (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Oct; 29(5):4. PubMed ID: 3200996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unlicensed hospital assistive personnel: efficiency or liability?
    Kreplick J
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):292-309. PubMed ID: 10156295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. E.R. patient commits suicide: nurse sued. Case in point: Keebler v. Winfield Carraway Hosp. (531 So. 2d 841--AL 1988).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Dec; 29(7):4. PubMed ID: 3212193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mental patient sets self on fire: nurses sued. Case in point: Valentine v. Strange (597 F. Supp. 1316--VA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Feb; 25(9):4. PubMed ID: 3844857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses dispense thorazine p.r.n.: constitutional issue. Case in point: Weiss v. Missouri Dept. of Mental Health (587 Supp. 1157--MO).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Oct; 25(5):4. PubMed ID: 6567946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. R.N. license reciprocity: effect of license loss. Case in point: Shoenhair, R.N. v. Commonwealth of PA (450 A 2d 877 - PA.).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Aug; 24(3):2. PubMed ID: 6555843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurse's failure to phone M.D.: hospital liability. Case in point: Nutty v. Jewish Hospital (571 F. Supp. 1050-IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Jan; 24(8):2. PubMed ID: 6560672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nurse and the recalcitrant patient: dilemma. Case in point: Bennet v. Winthrop Community Hosp. (489 N.E. 2d 1032--MA).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Apr; 26(11):2. PubMed ID: 3635147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.