464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6559592)
1. Nurse staffing methodologies: the relationship between quality and cost.
Jenkins E
Aust J Adv Nurs; 1983; 1(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 6559592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Patient classification and standards for nursing quality (II). Documentation of patients' need for nursing care as an administrative tool for personnel policy].
Ruland C
Fag Tidsskr Sykepleien; 1989 Nov; 77(19):13-6. PubMed ID: 2638160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Staff, patient, and cost outcomes of all-registered nurse staffing.
Hinshaw AS; Scofield R; Atwood JR
J Nurs Adm; 1981; 11(11-12):30-6. PubMed ID: 6915081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Project in Sunnaas hospital: nursing workload measurement and frequency study].
Lysberg K
Sykepleien; 1986 Oct; 73(17):12-4. PubMed ID: 3641449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does an all-R.N. staff provide better quality care?
Harman R
Hosp Adm Can; 1975 Aug; 17(8):35-8. PubMed ID: 10241249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validated indexes: key to nursing acuity standardization.
Kelleher C
Nurs Econ; 1992; 10(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 1732813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nurse staffing: accountability study focuses of staff abilities and patient needs.
Lavery WJ; Maynard WC; Ivan J
Mich Hosp; 1979 Oct; 15(10):26-9. PubMed ID: 10243981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using registry nurses: coping with cost and quality issues.
Sheridan DR; Bronstein JE; Walker DD
J Nurs Adm; 1982 Oct; 12(10):26-34. PubMed ID: 6924953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A nurse staffing evaluation model.
Cleland V; Marz MS; Killeen MB
Mich Hosp; 1985 Feb; 21(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 10270402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. DRGs and nursing workload measures.
Giovannetti P
Comput Nurs; 1985; 3(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 3921223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Acuity and staffing under prospective payment.
Adams R; Johnson B
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Oct; 16(10):21-5. PubMed ID: 3093644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient classification: a nursing model.
Diggs WW
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1985; 7(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 10311257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Living with DRGs.
Feldman J; Goldhaber FI
J Nurs Adm; 1984 May; 14(5):19-22. PubMed ID: 6425468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient classification system evaluation. Part 1: Essential system elements.
De Groot HA
J Nurs Adm; 1989 Jun; 19(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 2723792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nursing: using workload measurement systems.
Meijers A
Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Sep; 60(9):49. PubMed ID: 6628870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Computers for quality care. What can they do?
Culpepper RC
Comput Nurs; 1984; 2(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 6600097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nursing Classification System: foundation for personnel planning and control.
Dale RL; Mable RJ
J Nurs Adm; 1983 Feb; 13(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 6549775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manpower planning. Four. The quality of nursing services.
Goldstone L; Ball J
Nurs Times; 1984 Aug 29-Sep 4; 80(35):56-8. PubMed ID: 6567117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Formulating a managerial strategy for part-time nurses.
Wakefield DS; Mathis S
J Nurs Adm; 1985 Jan; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3917494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PCS: one system for both staffing and costing.
Dijkers M; Paradise T
Nurs Manage; 1986 Jan; 17(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 3632821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
