These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6560609)

  • 1. The PRB: will it pay off?
    Campbell D
    Nurs Mirror; 1984 Feb; 158(7):10-1. PubMed ID: 6560609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PRB: swift decision needed or nurses will lose out.
    Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1984 Mar; 158(12):11. PubMed ID: 6561628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pay-off that palls.
    Howie C
    Nurs Times; 1987 May 13-19; 83(19):21. PubMed ID: 3648706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The PRB has done nurses proud in 1985.
    Osborne R
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1985 Jun; (402):5. PubMed ID: 3847792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Body politic--gloves off in the pay battle.
    Sylvester R
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jan 7-13; 94(1):18. PubMed ID: 9481322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pay increases should start for many in July: new pay dates are announced.
    Oldfield S
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Jun; (353):1. PubMed ID: 6564379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pay claim: all work and no pay?
    Howie C
    Nurs Times; 1986 Jan 8-14; 82(2):19-20. PubMed ID: 3633104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pay campaign. Pay in practice.
    Payne D
    Nurs Times; 1995 May 3-9; 91(18):20-1. PubMed ID: 7753673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pay: time runs out.
    Salvage J
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jun; 150(18):6-7. PubMed ID: 6900342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pay '81: what are the prospects?
    Cole A
    Nurs Times; 1981 Mar; 77(10):393-4. PubMed ID: 6907881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pay: a new deal for nurses?
    Taylor S
    Nurs Times; 1984 Feb 1-7; 80(5):16-8. PubMed ID: 6560473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial views on pay review body.
    Ellis S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1983 Jan; (277):1. PubMed ID: 6550405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speakman on top nurses' pay. Why aren't equal salaries proposed.
    Hancock C
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jul; 149(2):6. PubMed ID: 257582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Whole thrust of case is in direct conflict with College's own document. Government's PRB evidence.
    Oldfield S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1984 Mar; (336):9. PubMed ID: 6560693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pay: nurses' 'irrefutable' case.
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1984 Feb 29-Mar 6; 80(9):21. PubMed ID: 6561591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stonewall Ennals and top nurses' pay.
    Watkin B
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Apr; 146(17):10. PubMed ID: 247396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pay: more haste, less speed.
    Dyson R
    Nurs Times; 1984 Feb 1-7; 80(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 6560474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assurances on pay given by Fowler.
    Oldfield S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1984 Feb; (335):1. PubMed ID: 6560687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.