These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6563425)

  • 21. Nurses are worth more.
    Philpot T
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Oct; 147(14):17-20. PubMed ID: 250077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Self restraint brings an advantage.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 May; (347):4. PubMed ID: 6563417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistics never lie - or do they?
    Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Sep; 153(12):21. PubMed ID: 6912552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Leisure galore.
    Watkin B
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 May; 146(21):7. PubMed ID: 247447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The great debate: 'we need more money now!'.
    Vaughan G; Dunwoody G
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Aug; 153(8):4-5. PubMed ID: 6911723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stonewall Ennals and top nurses' pay.
    Watkin B
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Apr; 146(17):10. PubMed ID: 247396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pay: nurses' 'irrefutable' case.
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1984 Feb 29-Mar 6; 80(9):21. PubMed ID: 6561591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Let's stick together.
    Watson C
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Apr; 154(17):22. PubMed ID: 6919083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pay: more haste, less speed.
    Dyson R
    Nurs Times; 1984 Feb 1-7; 80(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 6560474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assurances on pay given by Fowler.
    Oldfield S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1984 Feb; (335):1. PubMed ID: 6560687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The comparability report: where Clegg falls so short.
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 6899289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fury simmers as members wait for Whitsun on pay.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 May; (346):1, 12. PubMed ID: 6563404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The pay struggle - nurse managers' role.
    Rogers B
    Nurs Focus; 1982 Jul; 3(11):1, 20. PubMed ID: 6921559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The beginning of a new era? Pay review body.
    Gray A
    Nurs Times; 1983 Aug 10-16; 79(32):13-4. PubMed ID: 6555707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Let's see action!
    Brown K
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Oct; 153(18):17. PubMed ID: 6914610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Royal College of Nursing: new approach.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Jun; (352):4. PubMed ID: 6564373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The way out of the stop-go cycle. Nurses are worth more.
    Wells R
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Oct; 147(16):16-7. PubMed ID: 250101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pay: the nurses verdict.
    Ball D
    Nurs Times; 1984 Jun 27-Jul 3; 80(26):18-20. PubMed ID: 6564591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The comparability report: where Clegg falls so short.
    Hancock C; Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 6898136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.