These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. R.N.'s and drug abuse: license revocation. Case in point: Smith v. State of Alabama (435 So. 2d 108 - AL). Regan WA Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Nov; 24(6):4. PubMed ID: 6557596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Use and abuse of drugs: a social phenomenon of our age]. Caron R Infirm Aux; 1987; 59(4):18-20. PubMed ID: 3647935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurses and chemical dependency. The Board of Nursing's disciplinary role. Jensen EA Mich Nurse; 1987 Mar; 60(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 3645256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Legal disciplinary actions of nurses and personnel in public hospitals]. Cayla JS Soins; 1990 Feb; (533):59-60. PubMed ID: 2321062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State board criteria for licensure and disciplinary procedures regarding impaired nurses. Champagne M; Havens B; Swenson I Nurs Outlook; 1987; 35(2):54, 56-7, 101. PubMed ID: 3644241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Disciplinary responses to nurses' medication errors. Harnden L Dimens Health Serv; 1988 May; 65(4):26, 32. PubMed ID: 3384215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal case briefs for nurses. CO: altercation with pt.; Workers' Comp.; GA: private duty nurses: reimbursement issue. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Nov; 27(6):3. PubMed ID: 2948215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Spotlight on support for impaired nurses. Penny JT Am J Nurs; 1986 Jun; 86(6):688-91. PubMed ID: 3636065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Law for the nurse manager. Is termination proper? Creighton H Nurs Manage; 1984 Jan; 15(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 6560323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nurses and chemical dependency. Reporting suspected drug abuse or diversion. Mich Nurse; 1987 Mar; 60(3):9. PubMed ID: 3645260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Help for nurses' questions about refusal to follow directives from their employers. Murphy EK AORN J; 1986 Feb; 43(2):431, 434, 436. PubMed ID: 3633715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretations of state board criteria and disciplinary procedures regarding impaired nurses. Swenson I; Havens B; Champagne M Nurs Outlook; 1987; 35(3):108-10, 145. PubMed ID: 2952942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commission's drug testing proposal 'last resort' in controlling abuse. Polakoff PL Occup Health Saf; 1986 Oct; 55(10):26-7. PubMed ID: 3785806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unprofessional conduct and licensure revocation. Northrop CE Nurs Outlook; 1986; 34(1):48. PubMed ID: 3632837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal factors surrounding drug testing in the workplace. Bailey FL Pharmacotherapy; 1987; 7(3):58-60. PubMed ID: 3628062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. State boards and impaired nurses. Swenson I; Havens B; Champagne M Nurs Outlook; 1989; 37(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 2928143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Employee discipline and due process rights: is there an appropriate remedy? Hogler RL Labor Law J; 1982 Dec; 33(12):783-97. PubMed ID: 10257940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]