These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6565461)

  • 1. Nursing education/service. Contracting for growth.
    Aroian J; Grant KJ; Gilbert JP
    Am J Nurs; 1984 Aug; 84(8):1042, 1044. PubMed ID: 6565461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - part III. Developing performance standards and an evaluation tool for staff nurses.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(5):36-44. PubMed ID: 6924871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nursing management in critical care units. Performance appraisal of staff nurses: Part I.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 6918283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing support for the graduate nurse.
    McHugh M; Duprat LJ; Clifford JC
    Am J Nurs; 1996 Jun; 96(6):57-62. PubMed ID: 8651338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
    Cunningham CV
    Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance appraisal of staff nurses - Part II. Analyzing the old and planning for the new.
    Bray KA
    Crit Care Nurse; 1982; 2(4):89-90. PubMed ID: 6925523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance appraisal of CCU nurses.
    Huang SH; Dasher LA; Varner CF
    Nurs Manage; 1981 Oct; 12(10):50-5. PubMed ID: 6913847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staff development and performance review.
    Stewart AM
    Nurs Times; 1978 Apr; 74(16):654-6. PubMed ID: 652530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer evaluation: a component of faculty performance appraisal.
    Harwood CH; Olson J
    J Nurs Educ; 1988 Oct; 27(8):377-9. PubMed ID: 2852231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognize performance with merit increases (and keep your nurses happy).
    Ruskowski U
    Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Aug; 58(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 7286482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Special problem: evaluation of nurses in intensive care].
    Venturi F
    Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 1986 Apr; 79(4):91-2. PubMed ID: 3634864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic faculty evaluation: a growing critical concern.
    Bobbitt KC
    J Nurs Educ; 1985 Feb; 24(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 2984376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of enrolled community nurses in the management of child morbidity at an integrated maternal child health clinic.
    Malone MI
    East Afr Med J; 1980 Jan; 57(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 7371569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The chaos surrounding faculty evaluation.
    Fitzpatrick JJ
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(4):177. PubMed ID: 16921798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the scene: University of Cincinnati Hospital. Confronting inadequate clinical performance.
    Gallagher PH; Teehan MP
    Nurs Adm Q; 1985; 9(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 3844110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reaping the professional rewards of faculty evaluation.
    Cudney SA
    Nurs Health Care; 1985 Oct; 6(8):451-7. PubMed ID: 3851197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival kit for managers. 8. Staff appraisal and development.
    Pincus J
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Nov; 155(21):47-9. PubMed ID: 6924342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.