These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6567582)
1. Questioning the mailed questionnaire as a valid instrument for research in nursing education. Woolley AS Image J Nurs Sch; 1984; 16(4):115-9. PubMed ID: 6567582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fundamental issues in questionnaire design. Murray P Accid Emerg Nurs; 1999 Jul; 7(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 10693384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys. A randomized trial and a meta-analysis. Etter JF; Cucherat M; Perneger TV Eval Health Prof; 2002 Jun; 25(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 12026752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Designing questionnaires for midwifery research. Douglas F; van Teijlingen E; Brindle S; Hundley V; Bruce J; Torrance N RCM Midwives; 2005 May; 8(5):212-5. PubMed ID: 15960327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Telephone vs. Web-based prescreening predicts early but not overall physician response to a mailed survey. Bonuedie H; Kim E; Long J; Ryskina K J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():134-135. PubMed ID: 27498375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Some methodological aspects of using postal questionnaires with the elderly. Victor CR Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 1988 Jun; 7(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 3415396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Basics of research (Part 14). Survey research methodology: designing the survey instrument. Totten VY; Panacek EA; Price D Air Med J; 1999; 18(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 10345782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates. Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing the effectiveness of mailed health surveys. Gilbert GH; Longmate J; Branch LG Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 1410240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire. Paganini-Hill A; Hsu G; Chao A; Ross RK Epidemiology; 1993 Jul; 4(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 8347749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study. Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chapter I. Study design. Cannell CF; Groves RM; Miller PV; Thornberry OT Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):5-10. PubMed ID: 15791750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating response to follow-ups in mail surveys. Sudman S Public Opin Q; 1982; 46(4):582-4. PubMed ID: 10278173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes. Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mailed survey follow-ups--are postcard reminders more cost-effective than second questionnaires? Becker H; Cookston J; Kulberg V West J Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 22(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 10943176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]