These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6568279)

  • 1. From manuscript to published paper.
    Binkley LS
    J Nephrol Nurs; 1984; 1(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 6568279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.
    Jacobson AF; Schmidt K; Coeling H
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(1):1-4, 7. PubMed ID: 15739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Submitting a manuscript to the ASRT.
    Frosch JR
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(3):291-2. PubMed ID: 22267696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lesson from fate of rejected paper.
    Wiwanitkit V
    Indian Pediatr; 2011 May; 48(5):410. PubMed ID: 21654014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Teaching how to prepare a manuscript by means of rewriting published scientific papers.
    Tomaska L
    Genetics; 2007 Jan; 175(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 17110479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The central role of reviewers in sustaining this journal.
    Daly J; Lumley J
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2007 Dec; 31(6):503. PubMed ID: 18081565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Turn your presentation into a published manuscript.
    Gross AM; Fonteyn ME
    Am J Nurs; 2008 Oct; 108(10):85-7. PubMed ID: 18827554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts.
    Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist.
    Duchesne S; Jannin P
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1783-7. PubMed ID: 18053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What happens to your manuscript: characteristics of papers published in volume 160.
    Editors
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 160(12):1234-6. PubMed ID: 15583376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How can I get my nutrition manuscript published?
    Graham L
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2011 Apr; 111(4):638. PubMed ID: 21443999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approach to manuscript preparation and submission: how to get your paper accepted.
    Kern MJ; Bonneau HN
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 12594709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
    Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of a reviewer-prompting strategy on timely manuscript reviews.
    Caruso M; Kennedy CH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 15669412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].
    Grimby G
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.